dc.contributorSilva, Luís Alvaro de Lima
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8066370508832550
dc.contributorWives, Leandro Krug
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5996993884846655
dc.contributorNunes, Raul Ceretta
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7947423722511295
dc.creatorPozzebon, Ruan Carlo Bonilha
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-27T16:03:58Z
dc.date.available2018-08-27T16:03:58Z
dc.date.created2018-08-27T16:03:58Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-29
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/14105
dc.description.abstractRisk management is a key component of project management, which aims to identify, analyze and treat possible events that can compromise project success. In this context, the proposition and the improvement of technical processes that support risk management is a constant need, in particular seeking to standardize and formalize collaborative discussions of risks in software projects, for example. In this context, the use of alternative techniques of argumentation in the area of Artificial Intelligence applied to the area of risk management is discussed in this paper. This work presents schemes for argument proposition and discussion of risks, together with techniques of dialogue games, which aim to mediate collaborative discussions of risks in software projects. These schemes are designed to help novice users to propose risks, which can be described by well-trained and structured arguments. Furthermore, the paper discusses how to promote continuity and depth discussion of the risks with a set of critical issues, which make up the structure of the proposed schemes. The paper also presents a process for creation / standardization of argumentation schemes meant for this application domain. In particular, this construction process presents steps required to create arguments schemes in the area of risk management. From the use of this process, the development of regimens may be better understood, allowing the extension of this schema library and the consequent use of these schemes discussions risks. Based on the proposed schemes, this work presents a web system - Risk Discussion System (RD System v2.0) - built to provide a collaborative environment for discussions of risk, where different forms implemented and tested in our project can use schemes. In order to validate the approach proposed in this paper, two experiments were conducted. The results of these experiments show positive evidence for the acceptance and applicability of the approach in collaborative discussions of risks, as well as an increase in quality of the information typically managed through other risk management strategies.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherCiência da Computação
dc.publisherUFSM
dc.publisherPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Informática
dc.publisherCentro de Tecnologia
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.subjectEsquemas de argumentação
dc.subjectGerenciamento de riscos de software
dc.subjectArgumentação
dc.subjectArgumentation schemes
dc.subjectRisk management of software
dc.subjectArgumentation
dc.titleEsquemas de argumentação para discussão de riscos em projetos de software
dc.typeDissertação


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución