Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso de Especialização
O plano de ações articuladas como instrumento para colaboração entre governo federal e munícipios: limites e possibilidades para a melhoria da educação básica
Fecha
2011-02-28Autor
Silva, Andréia Aurélio da
Institución
Resumen
This research was carried out inside of Specialization in Educational Management.
With it we seek to contribute to the o the understanding of the incidence of Public
Policies in Education Management concerning the educational process in the
development of School Public Education, with special attention to the Plan of Joint
Actions (PJA) and their relations with the management of the Network School
Municipal Public. For this, we analyzed the participation of eleven cities of Santa
Maria region micro, belonging to the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, through study
of the documents that the PJA of these city. With this analysis, it was possible to list a
set of factors that influence the participation municipal secretariats of education in the
PJA, which were grouped into two blocks. The first block concerns the factors that
shape the possibilities for use in the PJA as a tool for operational collaboration
between the federal government and cities. The second block refers to factors that
finish for limiting the use of PJA, as a tool for the operationalization of this
collaboration. A representative example of the factor classified in the first block is the
formal accountability of educational managers at the macro level, in the person of the
Minister of Education and at the micro level, in the person of the Municipal Secretary
of Education, monitoring, enforcement and compliance actions be developed in each
of these levels. In the second block, we can mention the evaluation of PJA binding
only to the performance of students of public IDEB in these municipalities, which
makes the responsibility for the improvement of education, ultimately fall on the
schools and on school stakeholders In particular, teachers. Finally, analysis of the
PJA in these cities, shows that the recommended actions are proposed not as a 'twoway
street', a prerequisite for a system of collaboration, but as a 'one-way street', as
there is little room for new proposals for action on the part of municipalities, or for
actions that signal and direct the cooperation of the cities to the federal
government. So this policy the cities seem to be reduced to mere "recipients /
beneficiaries of the actions" of the federal government, which consequently can lead
to a standardization of management actions and Network School Municipal Public.