dc.creatorPalese, Alvisa
dc.creatorDestrebecq, Anne
dc.creatorTerzoni, Stefano
dc.creatorGrassetti, Luca
dc.creatorAltini, Pietro
dc.creatorBevilacqua, Anita
dc.creatorBrugnolli, Anna
dc.creatorBenaglio, Carla
dc.creatorDalponte, Adriana
dc.creatorDe Biasio, Laura
dc.creatorDimonte, Valerio
dc.creatorGambacorti, Benedetta
dc.creatorFasci, Adriana
dc.creatorGrosso, Silvia
dc.creatorMansutti, Irene
dc.creatorMantovan, Franco
dc.creatorMarognolli, Oliva
dc.creatorMontalti, Sandra
dc.creatorNicotera, Raffaela
dc.creatorPerli, Serena
dc.creatorRandon, Giulia
dc.creatorStampfl, Brigitte
dc.creatorTollini, Morena
dc.creatorCanzan, Federica
dc.creatorZannini, Lucia
dc.creatorSaiani, Luisa
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-16T15:09:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-17T14:40:42Z
dc.date.available2017-05-16T15:09:41Z
dc.date.available2019-05-17T14:40:42Z
dc.date.created2017-05-16T15:09:41Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierAssist Inferm Ric. 2016 Jan-Mar;35(1):29-35
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1702/2228.24018
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11447/1264
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2674894
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Nursing students obtain most of their university credits in internship environments whose quality can affect their clinical learning. Several tools are available to measure the quality of the clinical learning environment (CLE) as perceived by students: these instruments developed in other countries, were validated in Italian but do not discriminate those CLEs capable (or not) to promote significant clinical learning. AIM: To validate an instrument to measure the capability of the CLE to generate clinical learning; the secondary aim is to describe the learning environments as perceived by nursing students according to individual course site and tutorial models adopted. METHODS: The study will be developed in three phases: a) instrument development and pilot phase, b) validation of the psychometric properties of the instrument and c) description of the CLEs as perceived by the students including factors/item confirmed in the validation process. Expected outcomes. A large validation, with more than 8,000 participating students is expected; the construct under lying will be confirmed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and will report high internal consistency; the instrument will report also a high test-retest and inter-rater reliability; in addition, the instrument will demonstrate predictive ability by discriminating those units able (or not) to activate effective learning processes.
dc.languageit
dc.publisherIl Pensiero Scientifico Editore
dc.subjectClinical Learning Environment
dc.subjectassessment instrument
dc.subjectclinical learning
dc.subjectvalidation
dc.subjectnursing students
dc.titleStrumento di Valutazione Italiano degli Ambienti di Tirocinio per gli studenti infermieri (SVIAT): protocollo di validazione
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución