dc.creatorShippee, Nathan
dc.creatorRosen, Brooke
dc.creatorAngstman, Kurt
dc.creatorFuentes, Manuel
dc.creatorDeJesus, Ramona
dc.creatorBruce, Steven
dc.creatorWilliams, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-21T13:23:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-17T14:37:46Z
dc.date.available2017-03-21T13:23:47Z
dc.date.available2019-05-17T14:37:46Z
dc.date.created2017-03-21T13:23:47Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifierGen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6) p:563-569
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.06.014
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11447/1044
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2674345
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Within a practice-based collaborative care program for depression, we examined associations between positive baseline screens for comorbid mental and behavioral health problems, depression remission and utilization after 1 year. METHODS: This observational study of 1507 depressed adults examined baseline screens for hazardous drinking (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score ≥ 8), severe anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item score ≥ 15) and bipolar disorder [Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ) positive screen]; 6-month depression remission; primary care, psychiatric, emergency department (ED) and inpatient visits 1 year postbaseline; and multiple covariates. Analyses included logistic and zero-inflated negative binomial regression. RESULTS: At unadjusted baseline, 60.7% had no positive screens beyond depression, 31.5% had one (mostly severe anxiety), 6.6% had two and 1.2% had all three. In multivariate models, positive screens reduced odds of remission versus no positive screens [e.g., one screen odds ratio (OR) = 0.608, p = .000; all three OR = 0.152, p = .018]. Screening positive for severe anxiety predicted more postbaseline visits of all types; severe anxiety plus hazardous drinking predicted greater primary care, ED and inpatient; severe anxiety plus MDQ and the combination of all three positive screens both predicted greater psychiatric visits (all p < .05). Regression-adjusted utilization patterns varied across combinations of positive screens. CONCLUSIONS: Positive screens predicted lower remission. Severe anxiety and its combinations with other positive screens were common and generally predicted greater utilization. Practices may benefit from assessing collaborative care patients presenting with these screening patterns to determine resource allocation.
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectAnxiety
dc.subjectCollaborative care
dc.subjectDepression
dc.subjectMental and behavioral health screening tools
dc.subjectUtilization
dc.titleBaseline screening tools as indicators for symptom outcomes and health services utilization in a collaborative care model for depression in primary care: a practice-based observational study
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución