dc.creatorLecuna, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-03T15:47:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-17T14:35:18Z
dc.date.available2015-09-03T15:47:47Z
dc.date.available2019-05-17T14:35:18Z
dc.date.created2015-09-03T15:47:47Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11447/109
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2673879
dc.description.abstractEntrepreneurship has been associated with three categories of factors: (1) macroeconomic factors, such as unemployment and income; (2) factors related to government institutions, such as corruption and political stability; and (3) competitiveness-related factors, such as the capacity for innovation and the number of procedures required to start a business. In this study, I find that all three categories are equally significant and that a combination of these three categories generates the most significant statistical results. The findings also reveal that two specific indicators are consistently more significant than the others. I posit that better control of corruption and a lower unemployment rate are associated with increasing levels of entrepreneurial activity as measured by business registrations and entrepreneur participation rates. Furthermore, interaction tests between the control of corruption and competitiveness-related factors found that simultaneous decreases in corruption and the number of procedures required to start a business provide added value, jointly boosting entrepreneurial activity. Panel data from 55 nations for the 2004–2009 period support these findings
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherSchool of Business and Economics, Universidad del Desarrollo
dc.relationWorking Paper;17
dc.subjectEntrepreneurship
dc.subjectInstitutions
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.subjectEconomic development
dc.titleCorruption and bureaucracy in entrepreneurship
dc.typeDocumentos de trabajo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución