dc.creatorLarrosa, Davinia
dc.creatorRamón, César
dc.creatorAlvarez, Rocío
dc.creatorMartínez-Camblor, Pablo
dc.creatorCernuda, Eva
dc.creatorPascual, Julio
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-18T11:54:55Z
dc.date.available2019-03-18T11:54:55Z
dc.date.created2019-03-18T11:54:55Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierHeadache, Volumen 56, Issue 9, 2018, Pages 1466-1473
dc.identifier15264610
dc.identifier00178748
dc.identifier10.1111/head.12945
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/166880
dc.description.abstract© 2016 American Headache SocietyBackground: Pathophysiology of migraine is not fully known. A link has been proposed between migraine and patent foramen ovale (PFO). However, there are conflicting data regarding the causal relationship between PFO and migraine. Objective: To test a potential association between migraine frequency and PFO by way of an observational, single-center, case-controlled study. Methods: We studied a total of 130 chronic migraine (CM) and 53 episodic migraine (EM) patients. Transcranial Doppler with agitated saline injection was used to evaluate the presence and degree of PFO. PFO was judged to be present if any signal was detected. The degree of PFO during rest and Valsalva was quantified as follows: small (1–10 microbubbles [MB]), medium (10–25 MB), or large (>25 MB with shower or curtain pattern). PFO detected at rest were considered permanent, while those detected during Valsalva maneuver were classified as latent. Results: The prevalence of PFO was similar
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Inc.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceHeadache
dc.subjectmigraine
dc.subjectpatent foramen ovale
dc.subjecttranscranial Doppler sonography
dc.titleNo Relationship Between Patent Foramen Ovale and Migraine Frequency
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución