Artículo de revista
Detecting mood disorder in resource-limited primary care settings: Comparison of a self-administered screening tool to general practitioner assessment
Fecha
2013Registro en:
Journal of Medical Screening, Volumen 20, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 118-124
14755793
09691413
10.1177/0969141313503954
Autor
Vohringer, Paul A.
Jimenez, Mirtha I.
Igor, Mirko A.
Fores, Gonzalo A.
Correa, Matias O.
Sullivan, Matthew C.
Holtzman, Niki S.
Whitham, Elizabeth A.
Barroilhet, Sergio A.
Alvear, Katherine
Logvinenko, Tanya
Kent, David M.
Ghaemi, Nassir S.
Institución
Resumen
Objectives: Although efficacious treatments for mood disorders are available in primary care, under-diagnosis is associated with under-treatment and poorer outcomes. This study compares the accuracy of self-administered screening tests with routine general practitioner (GP) assessment for detection of current mood disorder. Methods: 197 consecutive patients attending primary care centres in Santiago, Chile enrolled in this cross-sectional study, filling out the Patients Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression and the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) for bipolar disorder, after routine GP assessment. Diagnostic accuracy of these self-administered tools was compared with GP assessment, with gold standard diagnosis established by a structured diagnostic interview with trained clinicians (SCID-I). Results: The sample was 75% female, with a mean age of 48.5 (SD 16.8); 37% had a current mood disorder (positive SCID-I result for depression or bipolar disorder). Sensitivity of the scree