dc.creatorValenzuela Yuraidini, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-11T13:00:57Z
dc.date.available2019-03-11T13:00:57Z
dc.date.created2019-03-11T13:00:57Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifierRevista Chilena de Historia Natural, Volumen 83, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 497-500
dc.identifier0716078X
dc.identifier07176317
dc.identifier10.4067/S0716-078X2010000400004
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/165176
dc.description.abstractUntil now, there are three evolutionary models: I) The Synthetic Theory of Evolution (STE) also named as the Neo-Darwinian model; II) The Neutral Theory of Evolution (NTE) with its daughter the Nearly-Neutral Theory of Evolution (NNTE); III) The Theory of Evolution by means of Natural Drift (NDTE) (Valenzuela 2007, 2009). All these theories accept that variation of genomes of living beings emerges by mutation. They disagree in relation of the causes of the acquisition and maintenance of the living being organization. STE proposes that the main factor for the acquisition and maintenance of fixated organization is selection and a marginal role of genetic drift. NTE proposed that the acquisition and maintenance of fixated organization is drift with a marginal role of selection, its daughter the NNTE includes besides selection with coefficients similar to the mutation rates. NDTE is derived from the conception of living beings as autopoietic processes, thus the acquisition and maintenance
dc.languageen
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceRevista Chilena de Historia Natural
dc.subjectNatural Drift
dc.subjectNeutral Theory of Evolution
dc.subjectSynthetic Theory of Evolution
dc.titleNeutral illusions, selective nightmares and autopoietic madness
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución