dc.creatorEstefo, G. B.
dc.creatorCampos, Nina Horwitz
dc.creatorBravo, I. L.
dc.creatorBernain, Gina Raineri
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-11T12:56:56Z
dc.date.available2019-03-11T12:56:56Z
dc.date.created2019-03-11T12:56:56Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifierActa Bioethica, Volumen 14, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 166-175
dc.identifier07175906
dc.identifier1726569X
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/164707
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this article is to examine the attitudes of a group of physicians and lawyers that practice in Santiago, Chile toward the application of a protocol which evaluates the capacity of patients to make autonomous health decisions. The responses were grouped in four dimensions: assessment, feasibility, acceptance and usefulness. The Wilocoxon rank-sum test was applied to evaluate the distribution significance of value differences. The results revealed a globally positive assessment of lawyers and physicians to the pertinence and usefulness of standardization of procedures. The physicians emphasized the practical aspects and the lawyers, protection of patient autonomy and human rights. Consideration of the opinions of medical and legal actors is indispensable when a civic bioethics is founded in ethical dialogue.
dc.languageen
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceActa Bioethica
dc.subjectAttitude
dc.subjectCapacity
dc.subjectCompetence
dc.subjectDifferential semantics
dc.subjectHuman rights
dc.subjectInformed consent
dc.subjectQualitative investigation
dc.subjectValues
dc.titleThe capacity of patients to make decisions in health: Attitude and meaning for physicians and lawyers Capacidad de los pacientes para tomar decisiones en salud. Actitud y significado para médicos y abogados
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución