dc.creatorCantillano, Pablo
dc.creatorRubio, Fabián
dc.creatorNaser González, Alfredo
dc.creatorNazar Saffie, Rodolfo
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-09T22:35:09Z
dc.date.available2018-07-09T22:35:09Z
dc.date.created2018-07-09T22:35:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierActa Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2017; 68(1): 1-8
dc.identifier0001-6519
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/149701
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and objectives: Endoscopic sinonasal surgery is the procedure of choice in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis and sinonasal polyposis refractory to medical treatment, with high rates of success (76%-97.5%). However, 2.5%-24% of those patients will require revision surgery (RESS). In this study, we present the clinical, anatomical, radiological and histological features of patients receiving RESS in our centre during a 3-year period. Methods: A retrospective review of clinical, anatomical, radiological and histopathological data of patients receiving revision endoscopic sinonasal surgery between 2012 and 2014 was carried out. Results: From 299 surgery procedures performed, 27 (9%) were revision surgeries. The mean patient age was 46 years, with a male/female ratio of 1.4/1. The most frequent preoperative and postoperative diagnosis was chronic polypoid rhinosinusitis. The mean time since the previous surgery was 6.1 years, with 11.9 months of mean follow-up since that surgery. Stenotic antrostomy was found during revision in 81.5% of the patients and incomplete anterior ethmoidectomy and persistent uncinate process, in 59.3%. In radiology, 70.4% of patients had persistent anterior ethmoidal cells. Antrostomy or widening of antrostomy was performed in 96.3% of cases and anterior ethmoidectomy or completion of it was performed in 66.7%. Conclusions: Polyps, stenotic antrostomy and incomplete ethmoidectomy were the most frequent causes of revision surgery, in concordance with the procedures performed. The patients had long periods of time without follow-up between surgeries. Further investigation is necessary to generate measures to reduce the number of revision surgeries.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceActa Otorrinolaringológica Española
dc.subjectEndoscopic sinonasal surgery
dc.subjectSinusitis
dc.subjectPolyposis
dc.subjectEndoscopy
dc.titleRevision endoscopic sinonasal surgery
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución