dc.creatorKing, Elizabeth M.
dc.creatorMontenegro Muñoz, Claudio
dc.creatorOrazem, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-18T20:09:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-26T01:14:53Z
dc.date.available2017-05-18T20:09:42Z
dc.date.available2019-04-26T01:14:53Z
dc.date.created2017-05-18T20:09:42Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifierSeries Documentos de Trabajo No. 320, Julio, 2010
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/144004
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2448068
dc.description.abstractT.W. Schultz (1975) proposed that returns to human capital were highest in economic environments where technology, price or production shocks were common and managerial skills to adapt resource allocations to those shocks were most in need. We hypothesize that variation in returns to human capital across developing countries can be explained in part by government institutions that blunt the magnitude of those shocks or that limit individual abilities to respond to those shocks. Using estimated returns to schooling and experience from 122 household surveys from 86 developing countries, we demonstrate a strong positive correlation between economic freedom and returns to human capital. The positive effect is observed at all quantiles of the wage distribution. Economic freedom benefits the most skilled who get higher returns to schooling; but it also benefits the least skilled who get higher returns from experience.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherUniversidad de Chile, Facultad de Economía y Negocios
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceSeries Documentos de Trabajo
dc.subjectReturns to Education
dc.subjectReturns to Experience
dc.subjectEconomic Freedom
dc.subjectInequality
dc.subjectQuantiles
dc.titleEconomic Freedom, Human Rights, and the Returns to Human Capital: An Evaluation of the Schultz Hypothesis
dc.typeDocumentos de trabajo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución