dc.creatorBarceló, Gonzalo
dc.creatorRíos, Juan Manuel
dc.creatorMaldonado, Karin
dc.creatorSabat Kirkwood, Alejandro Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-05T19:37:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-26T01:03:55Z
dc.date.available2016-12-05T19:37:15Z
dc.date.available2019-04-26T01:03:55Z
dc.date.created2016-12-05T19:37:15Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierJ Comp Physiol B (2016) 186:625–637
dc.identifier10.1007/s00360-016-0974-4
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/141657
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2445738
dc.description.abstractSeed-eating birds have a diet of high nutritional value; however, they must cope with plant secondary metabolites (PSM). We postulated that the detoxification capacity of birds is associated with a metabolic cost, given that the organs responsible for detoxification significantly contribute to energetic metabolism. We used an experimental approach to assess the effects of phenol-enriched diets on two passerines with different feeding habits: the omnivorous rufous-collared sparrow (Zonotrichia capensis) and the granivorous common diuca-finch (Diuca diuca). The birds were fed with one of three diets: control diet, supplemented with tannic acid, or supplemented with Opuntia ficus-indica phenolic extract (a common food of the sparrow but not the finch). After 5 weeks of exposure to the diets, we measured basal metabolic rates (BMR), energy intake, glucuronic acid output and digestive and kidney structure. In both species, detoxification capacity expressed as glucuronic acid output was higher in individuals consuming phenol-enriched diets compared to the control diet. However, whereas sparrows increase energy intake and intestinal mass when feeding on phenol-enriched diets, finches had lower intestinal mass and energy intake remains stable. Furthermore, sparrows had higher BMR on phenolenriched diets compared to the control group, whereas in the finches BMR remains unchanged. Interspecific differences in response to phenols intake may be determined by the dietary habits of these species. While both species can feed on moderate phenolic diets for 5 weeks, energy costs may differ due to different responses in food intake and organ structure to counteract the effects of PSM intake.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceJournal of Comparative Physiology B
dc.subjectBirds
dc.subjectBMR
dc.subjectGut size
dc.subjectKidney
dc.subjectOpuntia ficus-indica
dc.subjectPlant secondary compounds
dc.titleEnergetic costs and implications of the intake of plant secondary metabolites on digestive and renal morphology in two austral passerines
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución