dc.creatorVelitchkova, Ana
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-27T16:07:53Z
dc.date.available2015-11-27T16:07:53Z
dc.date.created2015-11-27T16:07:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifierSociological Forum, Vol. 30, No. 3, September 2015
dc.identifierDOI: 10.1111/socf.12188
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/135304
dc.description.abstractThis study proposes a micro-institutional theory of political violence, according to which citizens’ participation in political violence is partially an outcome of tight coupling of persons’ practices and self-identifications with institutional logics opposed to dominant logics associated with world culture, such as the nation-state and gender equality. The study focuses on two types of institutional carriers through which persons adopt institutional logics: routine practices and self-identifications associated with three institutional logics: the familial, the ethnic, and the religious logics. Using a 15-country survey data from early twenty-first-century sub-Saharan Africa, the study finds evidence in support of the theory. Reported participation in political violence is associated with practices and self-identifications uncoupled from dominant world-culture logics but tightly coupled with the patriarchal familial logic, with an oppositional ethnic logic, and with a politicized oppositional religious logic.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
dc.subjectInstitutional logics
dc.subjectMicrofoundations
dc.subjectPolitical violence
dc.subjectUncoupling and recoupling
dc.subjectWorld culture
dc.titleWorld Culture, Uncoupling, Institutional Logics, and Recoupling: Practices and Self-Identification as Institutional Microfoundations of Political Violence
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución