Artículos de revistas
1D Magnetic Interactions in CuII Oxovanadium Phosphates (VPO), Magnetic Susceptibility, DFT, and Single-Crystal EPR
Fecha
2015Registro en:
Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 3805−3814
DOI: 10.1021/ic503045d
Autor
Venegas Yazigi, Diego
Spodine Spiridonova, Evgenia
Saldías, Marianela
Vega, Andrés
Paredes García, Verónica
Calvo, Rafael
Costa de Santana, Ricardo
Institución
Resumen
We report the crystal face indexing and
molecular spatial orientation, magnetic properties, electron
paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra, and density functional
theory (DFT) calculations of two previously reported
oxovanadium phosphates functionalized with CuII complexes,
namely, [Cu(bipy)(VO2)(PO4)]n (1) and [{Cu(phen)}2-
(VO2(H2O)2)(H2PO4)2 (PO4)]n (2), where bipy = 2,2′-
bipyridine and phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, obtained by a new
synthetic route allowing the growth of single crystals
appropriate for the EPR measurements. Compounds 1 and 2
crystallize in the triclinic group P1̅ and in the orthorhombic
Pccn group, respectively, containing dinuclear copper units
connected by two −O−P−O− bridges in 1 and by a single
−O−P−O− bridge in 2, further connected through −O−P−O−V−O− bridges. We emphasize in our work the structural
aspects related to the chemical paths that determine the magnetic properties. Magnetic susceptibility data indicate bulk
antiferromagnetism for both compounds, allowing to calculate J = −43.0 cm−1 (dCu−Cu = 5.07 Å; J defined as Hex(i,j) = −J Si·Sj),
considering dinuclear units for 1, and J = −1.44 cm−1 (dCu−Cu = 3.47 Å) using the molecular field approximation for 2. The
single-crystal EPR study allows evaluation of the g matrices, which provide a better understanding of the electronic structure. The
absence of structure of the EPR spectra arising from the dinuclear character of the compounds allows estimation of weak
additional exchange couplings |J′| > 0.3 cm−1 for 1 (dCu−Cu = 5.54 Å) and a smaller value of |J′| ≥ 0.15 cm−1 for 2 (dCu−Cu = 6.59
Å). DFT calculations allow evaluating two different exchange couplings for each compound, specifically, J = −36.60 cm−1 (dCu−Cu
= 5.07 Å) and J′ = 0.20 cm−1 (dCu−Cu =5.54 Å) for 1 and J = −1.10 cm−1 (dCu−Cu =3.47 Å) and J′ = 0.01 cm−1 (dCu−Cu = 6.59 Å)
for 2, this last value being in the range of the uncertainties of the calculations. Thus, these values are in good agreement with
those provided by magnetic and single-crystal EPR measurements.