dc.creatorIglesias Álamos, Verónica
dc.creatorErazo Bahamondes, Marcia
dc.creatorDroppelmann, Andrea
dc.creatorSteenland, Kyle
dc.creatorAceituno, Paulina
dc.creatorOrellana Pozo, Cecilia
dc.creatorAcuña, Marisol
dc.creatorPeruga, Armando
dc.creatorBreysse, Patrick N.
dc.creatorNavas Acien, Ana
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-15T15:04:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-26T00:07:58Z
dc.date.available2014-12-15T15:04:41Z
dc.date.available2019-04-26T00:07:58Z
dc.date.created2014-12-15T15:04:41Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifierEnvironmental Research 132 (2014) 206–211
dc.identifierdx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.044
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/129374
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2433694
dc.description.abstractObjective To evaluate the relative contribution of occupational vs. non-occupational secondhand tobacco smoke exposure to overall hair nicotine concentrations in non-smoking bar and restaurant employees. Method We recruited 76 non-smoking employees from venues that allowed smoking (n=9), had mixed policies (smoking and non-smoking areas, n=13) or were smoke-free (n=2) between April and August 2008 in Santiago, Chile. Employees used personal air nicotine samplers during working and non-working hours for a 24-h period to assess occupational vs. non-occupational secondhand tobacco smoke exposure and hair nicotine concentrations to assess overall secondhand tobacco smoke exposure. Results Median hair nicotine concentrations were 1.5 ng/mg, interquartile range (IQR) 0.7 to 5.2 ng/mg. Time weighted average personal air nicotine concentrations were higher during working hours (median 9.7, IQR 3.3–25.4 µg/m3) compared to non-working hours (1.7, 1.0–3.1 µg/m3). Hair nicotine concentration was best predicted by personal air nicotine concentration at working hours. After adjustment, a 2-fold increase in personal air nicotine concentration in working hours was associated with a 42% increase in hair nicotine concentration (95% confidence interval 14–70%). Hair nicotine concentration was not associated with personal air nicotine concentration during non-working hours (non-occupational exposure). Conclusions Personal air nicotine concentration at working hours was the major determinant of hair nicotine concentrations in non-smoking employees from Santiago, Chile. Secondhand tobacco smoke exposure during working hours is a health hazard for hospitality employees working in venues where smoking is allowed.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.subjectExposure to secondhand tobacco smoke
dc.titleOccupational secondhand smoke is the main determinant of hair nicotine concentrations in bar and restaurant workers
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución