dc.contributorMolano Triviño, Alejandra Patricia
dc.contributorWancjer Meid, Benjamin
dc.creatorGuzman Ruiz, Gustavo Adolfo
dc.creatorYunez Luquetta, Alberto José
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-31T19:27:30Z
dc.date.available2013-01-31T19:27:30Z
dc.date.created2013-01-31T19:27:30Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/4156
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_4156
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine if there is a difference in interdialytic weight gain between patients treated with dialysate flow (Qd) of 400 mL / min vs Qd of 500 mL / min. Design: We conducted an intervention, crossover, randomized, double-blind study in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis to determine differences in interdialytic weight gain in patients treated with dialysate flow (Qd) of 400 ml / min and 500 ml / min. Patients: We analyzed data from 46 patients on chronic hemodialysis with Qd 400 ml / min and 45 with Qd 500 ml / min. Analysis: : Hypothesis testing for differences in interdialytic weight gain and other variables between groups was performed by paired t test. For the correlation analysis we calculated the Pearson coefficient. Results: There was no significant difference in interdialytic weight gain using QD 400 ml / min vs 500 ml / min (2.37 ± 0.7 vs 2.41 ± 0.6, p = 0.41) nor in Kt / V (1.57 ± 0.25 vs 1.59 ± 0.23, p = 0.45), potassium (4.9 ± 1.1 vs 5.1 ± 1.0, p = 0.45), phosphorus (4.5 ± 1.2 vs 4.4 ± 1.2, p = 0.56) or hemoglobin (11.3 ± 1.8 vs 11.3 ± 1.6, p = 0.96). Conclusions : In patients weighing ≤ 65 kg QD using 400 ml / min is not associated with lower interdialytic weight gain. We found no difference in dialysis efficiency which suggests that lowering Qd is a safe intervention at short term.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEspecialización en Nefrología
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma.
dc.source1. Penne E. Sodium Gradient : A tool to individualize dialysate sodium prescription in chronic Hemodialysis patients ? Blood Purif 2011; 31: 86-91.
dc.source2. Barth C, Boer W, Garzoni D, et al. Characteristics of hypotension-prone haemodialysis patients: is there a critical relative blood volume? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18(7): 1353-1360.
dc.source3. Manlucu J. Lowering Postdialysis Plasma Sodium (Conductivity) to Increase Sodium Removal in Volume-Expanded Hemodialysis Patients: A Pilot Study Using a biofeedback Software System. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2011;56 : 69-76.
dc.source4. Flanigan M. Dialysate composition and hemodialysis hypertension. Semin Dial 2004;17:279–283.
dc.source5. Charra B, Chazot C, Jean G et al. Role of sodium in dialysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2004; 56: 205–213.
dc.source6. Shaldon S. Dietary salt restriction and drug free treatment of hypertension in ESRD patients: a largely abandoned therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 1163–1165.
dc.source7. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32 (5 Suppl. 3) S112–S119.
dc.source8. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Regidor DL, Kovesdy CP et al. Fluid retention is associated with cardiovascular mortality in patients undergoing longterm hemodialysis. Circulation 2009; 119: 671–679.
dc.source9. Munoz J, Sun, S. Dialysate sodium and sodium gradient in maintenance hemodialysis: a neglected sodium restriction approach?. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2011) 26: 1281 – 1287.
dc.source10. Santos SF, Peixoto AJ. Revisiting the dialysate sodium prescription as a tool for better blood pressure and interdialytic weight gain management in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 522–530.
dc.source11. Keen ML, Gotch FA. The association of the sodium “setpoint” to interdialytic weight gain and blood pressure in hemodialysis patients. Int J Artif Organs 2007; 30: 971–979
dc.source12. Locatelli F. Dry weight and sodium balance. Semin Nephrol 2001; 21: 291-297.
dc.source13. Gotch FA. Preliminary clinic results with sodium-volume modeling of hemodialysis therapy. Proc Clin Dial Trasplant Forum 1980; 10:12-17.
dc.source14. Levin A. The benefits and side effects of ramped hypertonic sodium dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996;7:242-246.
dc.source15. Oliver MJ. Impact of sodium and ultrafiltration profiling on hemodialysis related-symptoms. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001;12:151-156.
dc.source16. Basile C. Efficacy and safety of haemodialysis treatment with the Hemocontrol TM biofeedback system. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;16:328-334.
dc.source17. Petitclerc T. A model for non invasive stimation of in vivo dialyzer performances and patient’s conductivity during hemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs 1993;16:585-591
dc.source18. Locatelli F. The effect on line conductivity plasma ultrafiltrate kinetic modeling on cardiovascular stability of hemodialysis patients. Kidney Inter 1998;53:1052-1060
dc.source19. Locatelli F. Optimal composition of the dialysate, with emphasis on its influence on blood pressure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:785-796
dc.source20. Thein H. Associations of a facility level decrease in dialysate sodium concentration with blood pressure and interdialytic weight gain. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:2630-2639.
dc.source21. De Paula F. Clinical consequences of an individualized dialysate sodium prescription in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2004;66:1232-1238.
dc.source22. Sun, S. Dialysate sodium and sodium gradient in maintenance hemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2011) 26: 1281 – 1286.
dc.source23. Alayoud A. A model to predict optimal dialysate flow. Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis 2012;2:1-7.
dc.source24. Agar J, Simonds R. Using water wisely: new, affordable, and essential water conservation practices for facility and home hemodialysis. Hemodialysis Int. 2009; 13: 32 – 37.
dc.source25. Abramson J. Winpepi Programs PAIRSetc manual. Version 3.15. p 48. 2012
dc.source26. Ducuara D., Martínez A. Efecto de ajuste del flujo dializante (Qd) sobre la eficacia en hemodialisis a pacientes de bajo peso. Repositorio Universidad del Rosario. 2011
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectFlujo del dializado
dc.subjectganancia interdialítica de peso
dc.subjectHemodiálisis
dc.titleEfecto del flujo del dializado sobre la ganancia interdialítica en hemodiálisis crónica (Estudio FLUGAIN)
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución