dc.contributorSanabria, Mauricio
dc.creatorMoreno López, Diddier
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T20:13:08Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T20:13:08Z
dc.date.created2016-08-30T20:13:08Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/12319
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_12319
dc.description.abstractThis work is inscribed in one of the major fields of organization studies: the strategy. The classical perspective of this field promoted the idea that projecting the organization to the future involves designing a plan (i.e. a series of deliberate actions). Further developments showed that strategy could be understood in other ways. However, the field’s evolution has favored in some degree the classic conception, for example by establishing multiple models to 'formulate' a strategy, but leaving in a second place the way in which this can 'emerge'. The aim of this research is to contribute to the current level of understanding concerning emerging strategies in organizations. In order to do so, an opposite—although complementary—concept to 'planning' and, in fact, very close in its nature to such type of strategies, was considered: improvisation. Since this concept has been nourished by valuable contributions from the world of music, we utilized the knowledge of this domain, by using the 'metaphor' as a theoretical resource to understand it and in order to achieve the proposed objective. The results show that 1) deliberate and emerging strategies coexist and are complementary, 2) improvisation is always present in organizational context, 3) there is a greater intensity of improvisation in the “how” than in the “what” of strategy and, as opposed to the conventional idea about it, 4) to improvise adequately some preparation is required.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherMaestría en Dirección
dc.publisherFacultad de administración
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.sourceAbbott, A. D. (2004). Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. Nueva York: W.W. Norton & Co.
dc.sourceAckoff, R. L. (1970). A concept of corporate planning. Nueva York: Wiley-Interscience.
dc.sourceAjit, K. (2008). Synchronization: Moving beyond re-engineering. The Journal of Business Strategy, 29(3), 51-54.
dc.sourceAktouf, O. (2001). La administración entre tradición y renovación (3a ed.). Cali: Artes Gráficas del Valle.
dc.sourceAlvesson, M. (1996). Leadership studies: From procedure and abstraction to reflexivity and situation. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(4), 455-485.
dc.sourceAlvesson, M. (2011). Interpreting interviews. Londres: SAGE.
dc.sourceAlvesson, M., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2012). Interviews. En G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges (pp. 239-257). Los Ángeles - Londres: SAGE.
dc.sourceAlvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2nd ed.). Londres: SAGE.
dc.sourceAlvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2011). Metaphors we lead by: Understanding leadership in the real world. Londres: Routledge.
dc.sourceAndersen, T. J., & Nielsen, B. B. (2009). Adaptive strategy making: The effects of emergent and intended strategy modes. European Management Review, 6(2), 94-106.
dc.sourceAndrews, K. R. (1971/1980). The concept of corporate strategy (Rev. ed.). Homewood: R. D. Irwin.
dc.sourceAnsoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy. An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
dc.sourceAnsoff, H. I. (1991). Critique of Henry Mintzberg’s ‘The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management’. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 449-461.
dc.sourceAnsoff, H. I., & Hayes, R. L. (1976). Introduction. En H. I. Ansoff, R. P. Declerck & R. L. Hayes (Eds.), From strategic planning to strategic management (pp. 1-12). Londres - Nuva York: Wiley.
dc.sourceAnsoff, H. I., & McDonnell, E. J. (1990). Implanting strategic management (2nd ed.). Nueva York: Prentice Hall.
dc.sourceAnsoff, H. I., Declerck, R. P., & Hayes, R. L. (1976). From strategic planning to strategic management. En H. I. Ansoff, R. P. Declerck & R. L. Hayes (Eds.), From strategic planning to strategic management (pp. 39-78). Londres - Nueva York: Wiley.
dc.sourceArshad, D. (2011). Understanding organisational improvisation: Foundations and performance implications. Doctor of Philosophy, Loughborough University, Loughborough.
dc.sourceBarney, J. B. (1997). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Reading: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
dc.sourceBarrett, F. J. (1998). Coda—Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. Organization Science, 9(5), 605-622.
dc.sourceBastien, D. T., & Hostager, T. J. (1988). Jazz as a process of organizational innovation. Communication Research, 15(5), 582-602.
dc.sourceBastien, D., & Hostager, T. (1988). Jazz as a process of organizational innovation. Comunication research, 15, 582-602.
dc.sourceBeatty, J. E. (2004). Grades as money and the role of the market metaphor in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(2), 187-196.
dc.sourceBerendt, J. E. (1994). El jazz: de nueva orleans a los años ochenta. Bogotá: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.sourceBerkowitz, A. (2010). The improvising mind: Cognition and creativity in the musical moment. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
dc.sourceBessudo, J.-C. (2007). Improvisación estratégica (2a ed.). Bogotá: Editorial Planeta.
dc.sourceBowman, E. H., Singh, H., & Thomas, H. (2002). The domain of strategic management: History and evolution. En A. M. Pettigrew, H. Thomas & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management (pp. 31-51). Londres: SAGE.
dc.sourceBozkurt, Ö. Ç., & Kalkan, A. (2013). Strategic focus in turkish smes: Emergent or deliberate strategies? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 929-937.
dc.sourceBurrell, G. (1996). Normal science, paradigms, metaphors, discourses and genealogies of analysis. En S. Clegg, C. Hardy & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 642-658). Londres - Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
dc.sourceBurrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Londres: Heinemann Educational.
dc.sourceChaffee, E. E. (1985). Three models of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 89-98.
dc.sourceChandler, A. D. (1962/1990). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
dc.sourceChia, R. C. H., & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy without design: The silent efficacy of indirect action. Cambridge, - Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.sourceCingano, F., & Pinotti, P. (2016). Trust, firm organization, and the pattern of comparative advantage. Journal of International Economics, 100, 1-13.
dc.sourceCollier, J. L. (1993). Jazz: The American theme song. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
dc.sourceCornelissen, J. P. (2005). Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. The Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 751-764.
dc.sourceCornelissen, J. P., Oswick, C., Christensen, L. T., & Phillips, N. (2008). Metaphor in organizational research: Context, modalities and implications for research --- Introduction. Organization Studies, 29(1), 7-22.
dc.sourceCreswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
dc.sourceCunha, M. P. e., & Cunha, J. V. d. (2006). Towards the improvising organisation. Business Leadership Review, III(IV), 1-6.
dc.sourceCunha, M. P. e., Clegg, S. R., & Kamoche, K. (2012). Improvisation as “real time foresight”. Futures, 44(3), 265-272.
dc.sourceCzarniawska, B. (2004). Metaphors as enemies of organizing, or the advantages of a flat discourse. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 166(1), 45-65.
dc.sourceCzarniawska, B. (2011). What comes first, the egg or the chicken? Or: Where do the metaphors we use in our research come from? En A. Carlsen & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Research alive: Exploring generative moments in doing qualitative research (pp. 50-57). Malmö: Liber - Copenhagen Business School Press.
dc.sourceDavidson, C. (2009). Transcription: Imperatives for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2), 35-52.
dc.sourceDe Contreras, A. (2005). La improvisación en el jazz: una introducción al lenguaje del jazz tanto desde sus convenciones externas como internas. — Primera parte. Musicalia, 3, 1-1.
dc.sourceDe Geus, A. (1997). The living company: Growth learning and longevity in business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
dc.sourceDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
dc.sourceDess, G. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2005). Emerging issues in strategy process research. En M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 3-34). Oxford - Malden,: Blackwell.
dc.sourceDuxbury, T. (2014). Improvising entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(7), 22-26.
dc.sourceEasterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. (2012). Management research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
dc.sourceEisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
dc.sourceEtkin, J., & Schvarstein, L. (2000). Identidad de las organizaciones: Invariancia y cambio. Buenos Aires: Paidós
dc.sourceFairtlough, G. (2005). The three ways of getting things done: Hierarchy, heterarchy & responsible autonomy in organizations. Bridport: Triarchy Press.
dc.sourceFalconi Campos, V. (1996). Gerenciamento pelas diretrizes (Hoshin Kanri) (2a ed.). Belo Horizonte: Fundação Christiano Ottoni, Escola de Engenharia da UFMG.
dc.sourceFayol, H. (1916/1917). Administration industrielle et générale: Prévoyance - organisation - commandement - coordination - controle (extrait du bulletin de la société de l'industrie minérale. 3e livraison, de 1916). París: H. Dunod et E. Pinat, Éditeurs.
dc.sourceFlick, U. (2007). Designing qualitative research. Londres - Thousand Oaks - Nueva Delhi - Singapur: SAGE.
dc.sourceForgues, B., & Vandangeon-Derumez, I. (2007). Analyses longitudinales. En R.-A. Thiétart (Ed.), Méthodes de recherche en management (3e ed., pp. 439-465). París: Dunod.
dc.sourceFuglsang, L., & Jagd, S. (2015). Making sense of institutional trust in organizations: Bridging institutional context and trust. Organization, 22(1), 23-39.
dc.sourceGenelot, D. (2001). Manager dans la complexité : réflexions à l’usage des dirigeants (3e ed.). París: INSEP consulting éd.
dc.sourceGirin, J. (1989). L’opportunisme méthodique dans les recherches sur la gestion des organisations. Ponencia presentada en el Congrès de l’Association Française pour la Cybernétique Economique et Technique (AFCET) - Journée d'étude la recherche-action en action et en question, École Centrale de Paris.
dc.sourceGlenn, A. B. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
dc.sourceGoatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. Londres: Routledge.
dc.sourceGolsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (2010a). Introduction: What is strategy as practice? En D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 1-20). Cambridge - Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.sourceGolsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (Eds.). (2010b). Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice. Cambridge - Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.sourceGoold, M. (1992). Research notes and communications design, learning and planning: A further observation on the design school debate. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 169-170.
dc.sourceGordon, C. (2013). Beyond the observer’s paradox: The audio-recorder as a resource for the display of identity. Qualitative Research, 13(3), 299-317.
dc.sourceGrant, D., & Oswick, C. (1996). Organizational discourse: Metaphors in organizational theory and behaviour. United Kingdom: KMPC.
dc.sourceGrieco, M., & Lilja, K. (1996). Research note: ‘Contradictory couplings’: Culture and the synchronization of opponents. Organization Studies, 17(1), 131-137.
dc.sourceGuba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. En N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks - Londres - Nueva Delhi: SAGE.
dc.sourceHafsi, T. (2000). Le champ de la recherche en stratégie : A la recherche d'un bâton d’aveugle. En M. Côté & T. Hafsi (Eds.), Le management aujourd’hui. Une perspective nord-américaine (pp. 1460-1469). Laval - París: Presses de l’Université Laval - Economica.
dc.sourceHafsi, T., & Thomas, H. (2005). The field of strategy: In search of a walking stick. European Management Journal, 23(5), 507-519.
dc.sourceHamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 67(3), 63-76.
dc.sourceHatch, M. J. (1999). Exploring the empty spaces of organizing: How improvisational jazz helps redescribe organizational structure. Organization Studies, 20(1), 75-100.
dc.sourceHatch, M. J., & Weick, K. E. (1998). Critical resistance to the jazz metaphor. Organization Science, 9(5), 600-604.
dc.sourceHelfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Malden: Blackwell Pub.
dc.sourceHelms-Mills, J., Dye, K., & Mills, A. J. (2009). Understanding organizational change. Abingdon - Nueva York: Routledge.
dc.sourceHennink, M., & Weber, M. B. (2013). Quality issues of court reporters and transcriptionists for qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 23(5), 700-710.
dc.sourceHeracleous, L., & Jacobs, C. D. (2011). Crafting strategy: Embodied metaphors in practice. Cambridge - Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.sourceHernández Betancur, J. E., Montoya Restrepo, I. A., & Montoya Restrepo, L. A. (2015). The mourning of the deliberate strategy for the arising of the emergent strategy. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, Special Issue 1 for IETC 2015, 547-556.
dc.sourceHill, R. C., & Levenhagen, M. (1995). Metaphors and mental models: Sensemaking and sensegiving in innovative and entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1057-1074.
dc.sourceHitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2013). Strategic management: Competitiveness & globalization (10e ed.). Australia - Mason: South-Western / Cengage Learning.
dc.sourceHofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. St. Paul: West Pub. Co.
dc.sourceHumphreys, M., Ucbasaran, D., & Lockett, A. (2012). Sensemaking and sensegiving stories of jazz leadership. Human Relations, 65(1), 41-62.
dc.sourceHutzschenreuter, T., & Kleindienst, I. (2006). Strategy-process research: What have we learned and what is still to be explored. Journal of Management, 32(5), 673-720.
dc.sourceInns, D. (2002). Metaphor in the literature of organizational analysis: A preliminary taxonomy and a glimpse at a humanities-based perspective. Organization, 9(2), 305-330.
dc.sourceJarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. Londres - Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
dc.sourceJohnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction: Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3-22.
dc.sourceKamoche, K. N., Cunha, M. P. e., & Cunha, J. V. d. (Eds.). (2002). Organizational improvisation. Londres: Routledge.
dc.sourceKamoche, K., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2001). Minimal structures: From jazz improvisation to product innovation. Organization Studies, 22/5, 733-764.
dc.sourceKamoche, K., Cunha, M. P. e., & Cunha, J. V. d. (2003). Towards a theory of organizational improvisation: Looking beyond the jazz metaphor. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2023-2051.
dc.sourceKatz, J. (2015). Situational evidence: Strategies for causal reasoning from observational field notes. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(1), 108-144.
dc.sourceKipping, M., & Cailluet, L. (2010). Mintzberg’s emergent and deliberate strategies: Tracking Alcan’s activities in europe, 1928-2007. Business History Review, 84(1), 79-104.
dc.sourceKvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
dc.sourceLearned, E. P., Christensen, C. R., Andrews, K. R., & Guth, W. D. (1965/1969). Business policy: Text and cases (Revised ed.). Homewood: R. D. Irwin.
dc.sourceLeatherdale, W. H. (1974). The role of analogy, model, and metaphor in science. Amsterdam - Nueva York: North-Holland Pub. Co. - American Elsevier Pub. Co.
dc.sourceLetiche, H., & van Uden, J. (1998). Answers to a discussion note: On the ‘metaphor of the metaphor’. Organization Studies, 19(6), 1029-1033.
dc.sourceLiedtka, J. M. (1998). Strategic thinking: Can it be taught? Long Range Planning, 31(1), 120-129.
dc.sourceLofland, J., Lofland, L. H., Snow, D. A., & Anderson, L. (2006). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (4th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
dc.sourceLortat-Jacob, B. (Ed.). (1987). L’improvisation dans les musiques de tradition orale. París: Selaf.
dc.sourceLowe, A., & Jones, A. (2004). Emergent strategy and the measurement of performance: The formulation of performance indicators at the microlevel. Organization Studies, 25(8), 1313-1337.
dc.sourceManning, P. K. (1979). Metaphors of the field: Varieties of organizational discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 660-671.
dc.sourceMantere, S., Sillince, J. A. A., & Hämäläinen, V. (2007). Music as a metaphor for organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(3), 447-459.
dc.sourceMcDaniel Jr., R. R. (2007). Management strategies for complex adaptive systems: Sensemaking, learning, and improvisation. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(2), 21-42.
dc.sourceMcMillan, E., & Carlisle, Y. (2007). Strategy as order emerging from chaos: A public sector experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 574-593.
dc.sourceMeyer, A., Frost, P. J., & Weick, K. E. (1998). The organization science jazz festival: Improvisation as a metaphor for organizing. Organization Science, 9(5), 540-542.
dc.sourceMihram, D., & Mihram, G. A. (1974). Human knowledge: The role of models, metaphors, and analogy. International Journal of General Systems, 1(1), 41-60.
dc.sourceMiller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). The longitudinal analysis of organizations: A methodological perspective. Management Science, 28(9), 1013-1034.
dc.sourceMinkowski, E. (2005). Le temps vécu : études phénoménologiques et psychopathologiques (2e éd.). París: Quadrige/PUF.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1971). Managerial work: Analysis from observation. Management Science, 18(2), B-97-B-110.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-making in three modes. California Management Review, 16(2), 44-53.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1975). The manager’s job: Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review, 53(4), 49-61.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1976). Planning on the left side and managing on the right. Harvard Business Review, 54(4), 49-58.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1977). Strategy formulation as a historical process. International Studies of Management & Organization, 7(2), 28-40.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934-948.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1981). What is planning anyway? Strategic Management Journal, 2(3), 319-324.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1987a). Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(4), 66-75.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1987b). The strategy concept I: Five Ps for strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), 11-24.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1990a). The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 171-195.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1990b). Does decision get in the way? (in Hickson’s “studying deciding: An exchange of views between mintzberg and waters, pettigrew, and butier”). Organization Studies, 11(1), 1-6.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1990c). Strategy formation: Schools of thought. En J. W. Frederickson (Ed.), Perspectives on strategic management (pp. 105-235). Nueva York: Harper Business.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1991). Learning 1, planning 0: Reply to Igor Ansoff. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 463-466.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning: Reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners. Nueva York: Free Press.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (Ed.). (2007). Tracking strategies: Toward a general theory. Oxford - Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257-272.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. W., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Nueva York: Free Press.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Théorêt, A. (1976). The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246-275.
dc.sourceMogalakwe, M. (2006). The use of documentary research methods in social research. African Sociological Review, 10(1), 221-230.
dc.sourceMontgomery, C. A., & Porter, M. E. (1991). Strategy: Seeking and securing competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
dc.sourceMontoya Restrepo, I. A. (2010). Una contribución a la comprensión de las estrategias deliberadas y emergentes de las organizaciones, desde una perspectiva evolutiva. Tesis de Doctorado en Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá. Recuperado de http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/2141/1/UNA_CONTRIBUCI%C3%93N_A_LA_COMPRENSI%C3%93N_DE_LAS_ESTRATEGIAS_DELIBER.pdf
dc.sourceMontoya Restrepo, I. A., & Montoya Restrepo, L. A. (2010, 3 al 6 de noviembre). Principales aportes en estrategia emergente. Ponencia presentada en la XLV Asamblea Anual del Consejo Latinoamericano de Escuelas de Administración (Cladea), Cartagena de Indias, Colombia.
dc.sourceMontoya Restrepo, I. A., & Montoya Restrepo, L. A. (2013). La formación de estrategias deliberadas y emergentes: una propuesta a partir de definiciones básicas de una metodología de sistemas suaves. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas: Investigación y reflexión, XXI(2), 67-95.
dc.sourceMontoya Restrepo, I. A., & Montoya Restrepo, L. A. (2015). Comprensión del concepto de emergencia, desde el aporte de Holland, Kauffman y Andrade. Innovar, 25(57), 27-43.
dc.sourceMontoya Restrepo, I. A., Montoya Restrepo, L. A., & Castellanos Domínguez, O. F. (2010). La metáfora organizacional: alternativa de entendimiento procedente de otras ciencias. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas: Investigación y reflexión, XVIII(1), 75-86.
dc.sourceMontoya Restrepo, L. A., Castellanos Domínguez, O. F., & Montoya Restrepo, I. A. (2004). La gerencia genética: una metáfora biológica aplicada a la gestión de la biotecnología. Innovar(24), 93-104.
dc.sourceMontuori, A. (2012). The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity: Social science, art and creativity. En S. O. Johannessen & L. Kuhn (Eds.), Complexity in organization studies (Vol. III: Implications and applications of complexity thinking in organization studies: Strategy, organizational dymamics and innovation, pp. 239-255). Los Ángeles: SAGE.
dc.sourceMorgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 605-622.
dc.sourceMorgan, G. (2006). Images of organization (Updated ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
dc.sourceMorin, E. (1981). La méthode I: La nature de la nature. París: Éditions du Seuil.
dc.sourceNachmanovitch, S. (2004). Free play: la improvisación en la vida y en el arte (2a ed.). Buenos Aires: Paidós.
dc.sourceOakes, S. (2009). Freedom and constraint in the empowerment as jazz metaphor. Marketing Theory, 9(4), 463-485.
dc.sourceÖrtenblad, A., Putnam, L., & Trehan, K. (2013). 30th anniversary – beyond morgan’s eight metaphors. Human Relations, 66(6), 879-881.
dc.sourcePascale, R. T. (1999). Surfing the edge of chaos. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 83-94.
dc.sourcePascale, R. T., Millemann, M., & Gioja, L. (2000). Surfing the edge of chaos: The laws of nature and the new laws of business. Nueva York: Three Rivers Press.
dc.sourcePatrick, M. (2008). Strategic improvisation. Journal of Business Strategy, 29(6), 59-61.
dc.sourcePettigrew, A. M. (1989). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. En R. Mansfield (Ed.), Frontiers of management (pp. 21-49). Londres - Nueva York: Routledge.
dc.sourcePina e Cunha, M., & Vieira da Cunha, J. (2012). Towards a complexity theory of strategy. En S. O. Johannessen & L. Kuhn (Eds.), Complexity in organization studies (Vol. III: Implications and applications of complexity thinking in organization studies: Strategy, organizational dymamics and innovation, pp. 107-119). Los Ángeles: SAGE.
dc.sourcePloyhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36(1), 94-120.
dc.sourcePorter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Nueva York - Londres: Free Press - Collier Macmillan.
dc.sourcePorter, M. E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(3), 43-59.
dc.sourcePorter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.
dc.sourceQuinn, J. B. (1978). Strategic change: “Logical incrementalism”. Sloan Management Review, 20(1), 7-21.
dc.sourceQuinn, J. B. (1980). Strategies for change: Logical incrementalism. Homewood: R.D. Irwin.
dc.sourceQuivy, R., & Van Campenhoudt, L. (2006). Manuel de recherche en sciences sociales (3e ed.). Paris: Dunod.
dc.sourceRasche, A. (2008). The paradoxical foundation of strategic management. Nueva York: Physica-Verlag.
dc.sourceRead, M. J. B. (2014). What coaches can learn from the history of jazz-based improvisation: A conceptual analysis. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 12(2), 10-23.
dc.sourceReuter, M., Wijkström, F., & Uggla, B. K. (Eds.). (2013). Trust and organizations: Confidence across borders. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.sourceRiviezzo, A., Skippari, M., & Garofano, A. (2015). Who wants to live forever: Exploring 30 years of research on business longevity. Business History, 57(7), 970-987.
dc.sourceRoge, J. N. (1996). An analysis of deliberate and emergent strategies relative to porter’s generic differentiator and cost leader: A bias and variance modeling approach. Developments In Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 23, 68-73.
dc.sourceRothman, A. M. (2014). ¿Cómo escribir canciones y componer música? www.escribircanciones.com.ar (Ed.) Recuperado de http://www.escribircanciones.com.ar/tienda/librodeescribircanciones.html
dc.sourceSaldaña, J. (Ed.). (2003). Longitudinal qualitative research: Analyzing change through time. Walnut Creek - Oxford: AltaMira Press.
dc.sourceSanabria, M. (2004). El pensamiento organizacional estratégico: una perspectiva diacrónica. Innovar(24), 59-81.
dc.sourceSanabria, M. (2014a). Réévaluation de l’approche cognitive du changement stratégique. Une étude des mutations des facultés de management colombiennes (2007-2012). Tesis de doctorado en Sciences de Gestion, Doctorat en Sciences de Gestion, Universidad de Caen Basse-Normandie, Caen, Francia.
dc.sourceSanabria, M. (2014b). Universidad & empresa (U&E) y una lectura del discurso de la Escuela de Administración de la Universidad del Rosario respecto a la administración (A) y sus dos dimensiones: Dirección (D) y gerencia (G) (A=D+G). Universidad & Empresa, 16(27), 9-44.
dc.sourceSanabria, M., & Smida, A. (2015). El campo de la estrategia: origen y evolución. En H. García Cardona (Ed.), Administración en salud (pp. 119-215). Medellín: Biblioteca Jurídica Diké - Universidad CES.
dc.sourceSanabria, M., Saavedra Mayorga, J. J., & Smida, A. (2014). Los estudios organizacionales (‘organization studies’): fundamentos, evolución y estado actual del campo. Bogotá: Escuela de Administración, Editorial Universidad del Rosario.
dc.sourceSchendel, D., & Hofer, C. W. (Eds.). (1979). Strategic management: A new view of business policy and planning. Boston: Little, Brown.
dc.sourceSchober, M. F., & Spiro, N. (2014). Jazz improvisers’ shared understanding: A case study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(Article 808), 1-21.
dc.sourceSchoenberg, A. (1950). Style and idea. Nueva York: Philosophical Library.
dc.sourceSchvarstein, L. (2000). Diseño de organizaciones: tensiones y paradojas. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
dc.sourceSimon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organization. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493-513.
dc.sourceSimon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Volume 2: Behavioral economics and business organization (Vol. 2). Cambridge - Londres: MIT Press.
dc.sourceSommer, E., & Weiss, D. (1995). Metaphors dictionary. Nueva York: Gale Research.
dc.sourceSoto, E., Soto, E., Dolan, S. L., Johansen Bertoglio, O., Losada i Marrodán, C., & Cruz, C. E. (2005). Decisiones en ambientes de incertidumbre. Barcelona: Ediciones Deusto.
dc.sourceSoubeyran, O. (2014). Pensée aménagiste et improvisation : l’improvisation en jazz et l’écologisation de la pensée aménagiste. París: EAC Éditions des Archives contemporaines.
dc.sourceStacey, R. (1993). Strategy as order emerging from chaos. Long Range Planning, 26(1), 10-17.
dc.sourceStacey, R. D. (2001). Complex responsive processes in organizations: Learning and knowledge creation. Londres - Nueva York: Routledge.
dc.sourceStacey, R. D. (2011). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations (6th ed.). Harlow - Nueva York: Financial Times - Prentice Hall.
dc.sourceStacey, R. D. (2012). Organizations as complex responsive processes of relating. En S. O. Johannessen & L. Kuhn (Eds.), Complexity in organization studies (Vol. II: Theorizing complexity in organization studies, pp. 315-326). Los Ángeles: SAGE.
dc.sourceStyhre, A. (2002). How process philosophy can contribute to strategic management. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 19(6), 577-587.
dc.sourceTaber, T. D. (2007). Using metaphors to teach organization theory. Journal of Management Education, 31(4), 541-554.
dc.sourceTaylor, B., & Sinha, G. (2006). Research methodology. New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.
dc.sourceTeece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
dc.sourceTeoh, S., & Wickramasinghe, N. (2012). Healthcare information systems design: Using a strategic improvisation model. En N. Wickramasinghe, R. Bali, R. Suomi & S. Kirn (Eds.), Critical issues for the development of sustainable e-health solutions (pp. 33-48). Nueva York: Springer.
dc.sourceThomas, C. (2015). Jazz improvisational approach to classical music. Horn Call: Journal of the International Horn Society, 45(3), 27-29.
dc.sourceTsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567-582.
dc.sourceTurner, S. F., & Rindova, V. (2012). A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23(1), 24-46.
dc.sourceTurner, S. F., Mitchell, W., & Bettis, R. A. (2013). Strategic momentum: How experience shapes temporal consistency of ongoing innovation. Journal of Management, 39(7), 1855-1890.
dc.sourceVainio, A. (2013). Beyond research ethics: Anonymity as ‘ontology’, ‘analysis’ and ‘independence’. Qualitative Research, 13(6), 685-698.
dc.sourceVan Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.sourceVélez, Á. R., & Garzón, M. A. (2005). La administración es algo más que gerencia. Revista Universidad & Empresa, 7(8), 7-30.
dc.sourceVendelø, M. T. (2009). Improvisation and learning in organizations - An opportunity for future empirical research. Management Learning, 40(4), 449-456.
dc.sourceVera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Theatrical improvisation: Lessons for organizations. Organization Studies, 25(5), 727-749.
dc.sourceVon Foerster, H. (2003). On self-organizing systems and their environments. En H. Von Foerster (Ed.), Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition (pp. 1-19). Nueva York: Springer.
dc.sourceWang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
dc.sourceWeick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks - Londres: SAGE.
dc.sourceWeick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9(5), 543-555.
dc.sourceWeick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9(5), 543-555.
dc.sourceWeick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford: Blackwell Business.
dc.sourceWeick, K. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization. Vol. 2. The impermanent organization. Chichester: Wiley.
dc.sourceWheelen, T. L., Hunger, J. D., Hoffman, A. N., & Bamford, C. E. (2014). Strategic management and business policy: Globalization, innovation, and sustainability (14th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
dc.sourceWhittington, R. (1993). What is strategy, and does it matter? Londres - Nueva York: Routledge.
dc.sourceWhittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731-735.
dc.sourceWormeli, R. (2009). Metaphors & analogies: Power tools for teaching any subject. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.
dc.sourceYanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (Eds.). (2006). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk - Londres: M.E. Sharpe.
dc.sourceYbema, S., Yanow, D., Wels, H., & Kamsteeg, F. (Eds.). (2009). Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life. Los Ángeles - Londres: SAGE.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectEstrategias emergentes
dc.subjectestrategia
dc.subjectimprovisación
dc.subjectimprovisación estratégica
dc.subjectmetáfora
dc.subjectmúsica
dc.subjectmúsica y administración
dc.subjectestudios organizacionales
dc.titleUn aporte a la comprensión de las estrategias emergentes en las organizaciones a través del concepto de improvisación y la metáfora musical
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución