dc.contributorGarzón Pulido, Lina Soledad
dc.creatorGarcía Riaño, Diego Armando
dc.creatorAragón Mendoza, Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-23T15:53:46Z
dc.date.available2012-11-23T15:53:46Z
dc.date.created2012-11-23T15:53:46Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/4006
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_4006
dc.description.abstractOrgan pelvic prolapse is a frequent pathology, especially in menopausic patients and most cases require surgical treatment. In this study we compared the incidence of early postoperative complications between anterior colporrhaphy by classical technique (TC) versus anterior colporrhaphy by site specific technique (CSE). We made a analytical, retrospective study of two cohorts of patients that required anterior colporrhaphy between august 2009 and june 2012. The first cohort was TC group and the second was CSE group. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar and comparable. The most frequent outcome was dehiscence; however, there was a difference without statistical significance between both techniques. The incidence of early new prolapse and the diagnosis of abscess or hematomes showed no statistical difference as well. There were not serious complications such as mayor intraoperative bleeding or bladder-urethral lesions. The results suggest that both techniques haw low incidence of early postoperative complications and therefore seem to be safe in management of anterior compartment pelvic prolapse.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEspecialización en Ginecología y Obstericia
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma.
dc.sourceWalker JA, Gunasekera P. Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors. Int Urogynecol 2011; 22:127–135.
dc.sourceSlieker-ten Hove MCPh, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJC, et al. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and possible risk factors in a general population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:184.e1-184.e7.
dc.sourceSeo JT, Kim JM. Pelvic organ support and prevalence by pelvic organ prolapse-quantification (POP-Q) in Korean women. J Urol. 2006; 175: 1769–177.
dc.sourceHerschorn S., et al. Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery for Sphincter Incontinence and Prolapse. Wein: Campbell-Walsh Urology, 9th ed. Ch.66. 2007.
dc.sourceAbrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurology and Urodynamics 2002; 21:167–78.
dc.sourceOlsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89:501–6.
dc.sourceKelly HA. Incontinence of urine in women. Urol Cutan Rev 1913; 17: 291–3.
dc.sourceMcCracken GR, Lefebvre G. Mesh-free anterior vaginal wall repair: history or best practice? The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2007; 9:233–242. RCOG.
dc.sourceGraves EJ, Gillum BS. National Hospital Discharge Survey: Annual summary, 1994. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 13(128). 1997.
dc.sourceVollebregt A, Fischer K, Gietelink D, van der Vaart C. Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh. BJOG 2011; 118:1518–1527.
dc.sourceEl-Nazer M, Gomma I, Ismail Madkour W. Anterior colporrhaphy versus repair with mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a comparative clinical study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 May 31. Artículo en proceso de publicación
dc.sourceAltman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C; Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group. Anterior Colporrhaphy versus Transvagina Mesh for Pelvic-Organ Prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12; 364(19):1826-36.
dc.sourceNatale F, Marziali S, Cervigni M. Tension-free cystocele repair (TCR): longterm follow-up. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Urogynecological Association, 22–25 October 2000, Rome, Italy.
dc.sourceBadlani G, Davila GW, Michael MC, Rosette JJM. Continency Current Concepts. 2009; 24: 329-341.
dc.sourcePetros PE. The Female Pelvic Floor. Function, dysfunction and management according with integral theory. 2nd ed. 2007; 2-4: (14-120).
dc.sourceMaher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Nov; 22(11): 1445-57.
dc.sourceNguyen JAN, Burchett Jr. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111:891–898.
dc.sourceWorld Health Statistics report 2011. World Health Organization.
dc.sourceNygaard I, Barber M. Prevalence of Symptomatic Pelvic Floor Disorders in US Women. JAMA. 2008 September 17; 300(11): 1311–1316.
dc.sourceVimplis S, Hooper P. Assessment and management of pelvic organ prolapse. Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2005; 15: 387–393.
dc.sourceAbed H, Rogers G. Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Diagnosis and Treatment. Med Clin N Am. 2008; 92: 1273–1293.
dc.sourceNygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D. Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Older Women: Prevalence and Risk Factors. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 489–97.
dc.sourceWeber Am, Abrams P, Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Davis G, Dmochowski R, Fischer J, Hull T, Nygaard I, Weidner AC. The Standardization of Terminology for Researchers in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders. Int Urogynecol J 2001; 12: 178–186.
dc.sourceYoung S.Vaginal Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2009; 36: 565–584.
dc.sourceDeLancey JO. Anatomical aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1717–28.
dc.sourceShull BL, Benn SJ, Kuehl TJ. Surgical management of prolapse of the anterior vaginal segment: An analysis of support defects, operative morbidity, and anatomic outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171 (6): 1429 – 1439.
dc.sourceElkins TE, Chesson RR, Videla F. Transvaginal paravaginal repair: A useful adjunctive procedure in pelvic relaxation surgery. J Pelvic Surg 2000; 6:11 – 15.
dc.sourceMallipeddi P, Kohli N, Steele AC, Owens RG, Karram MM. Vaginal paravaginal repair in the surgical treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Prim Care Update Ob Gyn. 1998 Jul 1; 5(4): 199-200.
dc.sourceCorriere J, Sandler C. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de las lesiones vesicales. Urol Clin N Am. 2006; 33: 67-71.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectProlapso de piso pélvico
dc.subjectComponente anterior
dc.subjectColporrafia anterior sitio específico
dc.subjectComplicaciones
dc.titleComplicaciones postoperatorias tempranas de la colporrafia anterior por técnica tradicional versus técnica de sitio específico
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución