dc.contributorIsaza-Restrepo, Andres
dc.contributorVillaveces, Mariana
dc.creatorGuataquira Sierra, Nidya Consuelo
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-13T21:09:55Z
dc.date.available2015-11-13T21:09:55Z
dc.date.created2015-11-13T21:09:55Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/11517
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_11517
dc.description.abstractThe management of intestinal obstruction due to adhesions remains a challenge for any specialist in surgery, because there is controversy over the scope of medical management and the optimal time to consider surgical treatment for the resolution of symptoms. It is intended to identify factors associated to surgical treatment in patients with intestinal obstruction due to adhesions. Methods: A case-control study was performed in a ratio of 1:1, recluting 48 patients per group, over the period between May 2012 and May 2014 at Hospital Universitario Mayor Mederi and Barrios Unidos. There are considered as cases: patients who underwent a to surgical treatment with a diagnosis of intestinal obstruction due to adhesions, and are considered control patients, the ones who were managed with medical treatment. Factors such as age, pathological and surgical medical history, time of evolution of symptoms, laboratory and imaging findings were evaluated. Results: A total of 158 patients were collected (78 cases, 80 controls). The population was parametric (p = 0.13). The statistically significant factors associated for surgical treatment were male gender, presence of fever on admission, the finding of thickening of the intestinal wall and closed-loop obstruction in diagnostic imaging (p <0.05). Discussion : The main factors associated for a patient with intestinal obstruction by adhesions requiring surgical management are consistent with literature. Socialization of results is required to reduce morbidity and mortality of our patients.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEspecialización en Cirugía General
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.sourceCappell MS, Batke M. Mechanical obstruction of the small bowel and colon. Med Clin North Am. 2008;92(3):575-97, viii.
dc.sourceDi Saverio S, Coccolini F, Galati M, Smerieri N, Biffl WL, Ansaloni L, et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg. 2013;8(1):42.
dc.sourceMargenthaler JA, Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Grossmann EM, Schifftner TL, et al. Risk factors for adverse outcomes following surgery for small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg. 2006;243(4):456-64.
dc.sourceDuron JJ, du Montcel ST, Berger A, Muscari F, Hennet H, Veyrieres M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of mortality and morbidity after operation for adhesive postoperative small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 2008;195(6):726-34.
dc.sourceFevang BT, Fevang J, Stangeland L, Soreide O, Svanes K, Viste A. Complications and death after surgical treatment of small bowel obstruction: A 35-year institutional experience. Ann Surg. 2000;231(4):529-37.
dc.sourceMenzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990;72(1):60-3.
dc.sourceBarmparas G, Branco BC, Schnüriger B, Lam L, Inaba K, Demetriades D. The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(10):1619-28.
dc.sourcevan Oudheusden TR, Aerts BA, de Hingh IH, Luyer MD. Challenges in diagnosing adhesive small bowel obstruction. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(43):7489-93.
dc.sourceZielinski MD, Eiken PW, Bannon MP, Heller SF, Lohse CM, Huebner M, et al. Small bowel obstruction-who needs an operation? A multivariate prediction model. World J Surg. 2010;34(5):910-9.
dc.sourceTreves F. Intestinal Obstruction : Its Varieties with their Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment : the Jacksonian Prize Essay of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1883. London,1884. 515 s. p.
dc.sourceTaylor GW, Jayne DG, Brown SR, Thorpe H, Brown JM, Dewberry SC, et al. Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial. Br J Surg. 2010;97(1):70-8.
dc.sourceDayton MT, Dempsey DT, Larson GM, Posner AR. New paradigms in the treatment of small bowel obstruction. Curr Probl Surg. 2012;49(11):642-717.
dc.sourceAshley SW, Maingot R, Zinner M. Maingot's abdominal operations. 11. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division; 2007. xvi, 1309 s. p.
dc.sourceBoudiaf M, Soyer P, Terem C, Pelage JP, Maissiat E, Rymer R. Ct evaluation of small bowel obstruction. Radiographics. 2001;21(3):613-24.
dc.sourceChang WC, Ko KH, Lin CS, Hsu HH, Tsai SH, Fan HL, et al. Features on MDCT that predict surgery in patients with adhesive-related small bowel obstruction. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89804.
dc.sourceFidler JL, Guimaraes L, Einstein DM. MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiographics. 2009;29(6):1811-25.
dc.sourceNagle A, Ujiki M, Denham W, Murayama K. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 2004;187(4):464-70.
dc.sourceWiggins T, Markar SR, Harris A. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015.
dc.sourceTeixeira PG, Karamanos E, Talving P, Inaba K, Lam L, Demetriades D. Early operation is associated with a survival benefit for patients with adhesive bowel obstruction. Ann Surg. 2013;258(3):459-65.
dc.sourceSchraufnagel D, Rajaee S, Millham FH. How many sunsets? Timing of surgery in adhesive small bowel obstruction: a study of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(1):181-7; discussion 7-9.
dc.sourceKeenan JE, Turley RS, McCoy CC, Migaly J, Shapiro ML, Scarborough JE. Trials of nonoperative management exceeding 3 days are associated with increased morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for uncomplicated adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(6):1367-72.
dc.sourceChen SC, Lee CC, Hsu CY, Yen ZS, Fang CC, Ma MH, et al. Progressive increase of bowel wall thickness is a reliable indicator for surgery in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(9):1764-71.
dc.sourceBranco BC, Barmparas G, Schnüriger B, Inaba K, Chan LS, Demetriades D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2010;97(4):470-8.
dc.sourceAbbas SM, Bissett IP, Parry BR. Meta-analysis of oral water-soluble contrast agent in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2007;94(4):404-11.
dc.sourceWadani HA, Al Awad NI, Hassan KA, Zakaria HM, Alaqeel FO, A AAM. Role of water soluble contrast agents in assigning patients to a non-operative course in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Oman Med J. 2011;26(6):454-6.
dc.sourceMora López L, Serra-Aracil X, Llaquet Bayo H, Navarro Soto S. [Use of Gastrografin(®) in the management of adhesion intestinal obstruction]. Cir Esp. 2013;91(6):384-8.
dc.sourceZielinski MD, Eiken PW, Heller SF, Lohse CM, Huebner M, Sarr MG, et al. Prospective, observational validation of a multivariate small-bowel obstruction model to predict the need for operative intervention. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(6):1068-76.
dc.sourceO'Leary EA, Desale SY, Yi WS, Fujita KA, Hynes CF, Chandra SK, et al. Letting the sun set on small bowel obstruction: can a simple risk score tell us when nonoperative care is inappropriate? Am Surg. 2014;80(6):572-9.
dc.sourceBaquero D. Propuesta para evaluar la calidad en la atención del paciente de cirugía general de urgencia. Bogotá D.C.: Universidad del Rosario; 2014.
dc.sourceRESOLUCION Nº 008430, (1993).
dc.sourceMucha P. Small intestinal obstruction. Surg Clin North Am. 1987;67(3):597-620.
dc.sourceCox MR, Gunn IF, Eastman MC, Hunt RF, Heinz AW. The safety and duration of non-operative treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993;63(5):367-71.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectObstrucción intestinal
dc.subjectsíndrome adherencial
dc.titleFactores asociados a tratamiento quirúrgico en pacientes con obstrucción intestinal por adherencias
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución