Las interacciones organizacionales desde la visión ecológica: la competencia

dc.contributorNoguera-Hidalgo, Angela-Lucía
dc.creatorRiveros Ardila, Astrid Carolina
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-04T16:09:38Z
dc.date.available2013-12-04T16:09:38Z
dc.date.created2013-12-04T16:09:38Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/4809
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_4809
dc.description.abstractAs part of the PhD degree work of Ángela Lucia Noguera Hidalgo, this paper collects a compilation of several sources related to the biological concept of “competition” and its relation to the enterprises. It is a work where 24 articles realated to this approach are summarized.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherAdministrador de negocios internacionales
dc.publisherFacultad de administración
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARÁGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización.
dc.sourceAndrevski, G., & Ferrier, W. (2008). Toward an “Austrian” theory of sustainable competitive advantage: The role of value-enhancing actions. Presented at the Competitive Dynamics Research Workshop 2008 (Helsinki, Finland).
dc.sourceBarnett, W. P. (1997). The dynamics of competitive intensity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 128-160.
dc.sourceBarnett, W. P. & McKendrick, D. G. (2004) Why are some organizations more competitive than others? evidence from a changing global market. Administrative science quarterly., 49 (4). 535-571
dc.sourceBeck, N. (2008). Organizational ecology as a theory of competition. The institutions of the market: organizations, social systems, and governance, 202.
dc.sourceBergen, M.E. & Peteraf, M.A.(2002). Competitor identification and competitor analysis: a broad-based managerial approach. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23, 157–169.
dc.sourceBettis, R.A. & Hitt, M.A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 16, 7–20.
dc.sourceBogner, W.C. & Barr, P.S. (2000). Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: a cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organization Science, 11, 212–226.
dc.sourceChen, M.-J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21, 100–134.
dc.sourceChen, M.-J. & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive Dynamics: Themes, Trends, and a Prospective Research Platform. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 135-210.
dc.sourceD’Aveni R. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. New York: Free Press.
dc.sourceD’Aveni, R, Battista, G. & Smith, K.G. (2010).The Age of Temporary Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (13), 1371-1385.
dc.sourceDerfus, P. J., Maggitti, P. G., Grimm, C. M., & Smith, K. G. (2008). The Red Queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 61– 80.
dc.sourceFerrier, W.J., MacFhionnlaoich, C., Smith, K.G. & Grimm, C.M. (2002). The impact of performance distress on aggressive competitive behavior: a reconciliation of competing views. Managerial & Decision Economics 23,301–316.
dc.sourceGrant, R. M. The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review 33(3), 114-135.
dc.sourceGrimm, C.M., Lee, H. & Smith, K.G. (2005). Strategy as Action: Competitive Dynamics and Competitive Advantage. Oxford U.K.: Oxford University Press.
dc.sourceHan, Y. (2007). Population ecology, strategic choice and competition. International Journal of Business Research, VII(4), 124-128.
dc.sourceMintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: Free Press.
dc.sourceNúñez-Nickel, M., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2006). New size measurements in population ecology. Small Business Economics, 26(1), 61-81.
dc.sourcePorter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press
dc.sourcePorter, M.E. (1987) From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy, Harvard Business Review, May/June 1987, 43–59.
dc.sourcePorter, M.E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 61–78.
dc.sourceReydon, T. A., & Scholz, M. (2009). Why organizational ecology is not a darwinian research program. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 39(3), 408-439.
dc.sourceRindova, V., Ferrier, W. & Wiltbank, R. (2010). Value from gestalt: how sequences of competitive actions create advantage for firms in nascent markets. Strategic Management Journal 31(13), 1474–1497.
dc.sourceSalimath, M. S., & Jones III, R. (2011). Population ecology theory: implications for sustainability. Management Decision, 49(6), 874-910.
dc.sourceSengupta, J.K. (2002). Model of Hypercompetition. International Journal of Systems Science, 33 (8), 669-675.
dc.sourceSirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., Arregle, J.L. & Campbell, J.T. (2010). The dynamic interplay of capability strengths and weaknesses: investigating the bases of temporary competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1386–1409.
dc.sourceSchumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.
dc.sourceTisdell, C. A. (2001). Competition, Evolution and Optimisation: Comparisons of Models in Economics and Ecology (No. 48384). University of Queensland, School of Economics.
dc.sourceThomas, L.G, III. (1996). The Two Faces of Competition: Dynamic Resourcefulness and the Hypercompetitive Shift. Organization Science, 7(3), 221-242.
dc.sourceThompson, J.D. (1957). Organization in Action. New York: McGraw-hill
dc.sourceWiggins R y Ruefli TW.(2005). Schumpeter’s Ghost: Is Hypercompetition Making The Best of Times Shorter?. Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 887-911.
dc.sourceWu, M. (2012). Managing Stakeholders: An Integrative Perspective on the Source of Competitive Advantage. Asian Social Science, 8 (10), 160-172.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectCompetencia
dc.subjectVentaja competitiva
dc.subjectIncertidumbre
dc.subjectEcología
dc.titleLas interacciones organizacionales desde la visión ecológica: la competencia
dc.typebachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución