dc.contributorTorres de Galvis, Yolanda
dc.contributorBareño Silva, José
dc.creatorNavarro Naranjo, Pedro Iván
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-24T16:00:17Z
dc.date.available2016-10-24T16:00:17Z
dc.date.created2016-10-24T16:00:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/12505
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_12505
dc.description.abstractBackgroundPost-lasik corneal ectasia (PLCE) is an infrequent but devastating complication in lasik surgery to treat patients with myopia with or without astigmatism. Based on elevation corneal tomography through Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR System, Oculus Weztlar, Germany), we proposed a novel cummulative risk index to be used as a screening diagnostic tool to prevent this surgical complication. MethodologyWe performed an analytic observational cross-sectional study with diagnostic test design aimed to evaluate receiver operating characteristics of NICE index using Belin-Ambrosio display as a standard of reference (Pentacam HR, Wetzlar Germany). We performed a binary logistic regression model, 2x2 contingence tables and measured area under curve ROC. ResultsA final study sample of 361 eyes, 59, 3% from female patients with median age of 30 years old (IQR 11, 0) were evaluated. Binary logistic regression model included four independent quantitative variables (K2, PAQUI, EP, I-S) and one qualitative (SEX) were evaluated to know their relationship to dependent variable, NICE (Final Score). Four independent quantitative variables and one qualitative were statistically significant; NICE index classified adequately 92% of patients included in the study regarding presence or absence of PLCE risk. Nagelkerke coefficient was estimated on 74, 4%. ConclusionsCummulative risk index NICE is a novel diagnostic test to evaluate lasik refractive surgery candidates to prevent secondary corneal ectasia.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherMaestría en Epidemiología
dc.publisherFacultad de medicina
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.sourceSeiler T, Koufala K, Richter G. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in sity keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 14:312–7.
dc.sourceMoshirfar M, Smedley J, Muthappan V, Jarsted A, Ostler E. Rate of ectasia and incidence of irregular topography in patients with unidentified preoperative risk factors undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;9:35–40
dc.sourceRandleman B, Russell B, Ward M, Thompson K, Stulting D. Risk factor and prognosis for corneal ectasia after lasik. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(2 February):267–75.
dc.sourceChan CK, Hodge C, Sutton G. External analysis of the Randleman ectasia risk factor score system: A review of 36 cases of post-LASIK ectasia. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2010;38:335–40.
dc.sourcePallikaris IG, Papatsanaki M.textClipping
dc.sourceBelin M, Ambrosio R. Scheimpflug imaging for keratoconus and ectatic disease. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61:401–6.
dc.sourceTabbara KF, Kobt AA. Risk factors for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(9):1618–22.
dc.sourceRandleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:37–50.
dc.sourceTatar M, Kantarci F, Yildirim A, Uslu H, Colak H, Goker H, Gurler B. Risk factors in post-lasik corneal ectasia. J Ophthalmol. 2014;204191:1–4.
dc.sourceTaravella M, Scott T, Perozek T. LASIK Myopia. Medscape [Internet]. 2016; Disponible en: www.emedicine.medscape.com
dc.sourceNetto M, De Espíndola R, Fernandes Nogueira R, Campos M, Ambrósio Jr R, De Andrade N. Brazilian Trends in Refractive Surgery. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2013;76(1):29–32
dc.sourceStojanovic A, Nitter TA. 200 Hz flying-spot technology of the LaserSight LSX excimer laser in the treatment of myopic astigmatism: six and twelve months outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(8):1263–77.
dc.sourceBarraquer JI. Queratomileusis y queratofaquia. Instituto Barraquer de América. 1980. 342 p.
dc.sourceReinstein D, Archer T, Gobbe M. The history of lasik. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(4):291–8.
dc.sourceRabinowitz YS. Videokeratography indexes to aid in screening for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 1995;11(5):371–9.
dc.sourceGatinel D, Saad A. The challenges of the detection of subclinical keratoconus at its earliest stage. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2012;1(1):36–43.
dc.sourceSaad A, Gatinel D. Topographic and tomographic properties of forme fruste keratoconus corneas. IOVS. 2010;51(11):5546–55
dc.sourceMaeda N, Klyce S, Smolek M. Comparison of methods for detecting keratoconus using videokeratography. Arch Opthalmology. 1995;113(7).
dc.sourceSedghipour MR, Sadigh AL, Motlagh BF. Revisiting corneal topography for the diagnosis of keratoconus: use of Rabinowitz KISA% index. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:181–4.
dc.sourceBinder P, Lindstrom R, Stulting D, Donnenfeld E, Wu H, McDonnell P, Rabinowitz Y. Keratoconus and corneal ectasia after lasik. J Cataract Refract Surg. 31:2035–8
dc.sourceKamiya K, Ishii R, Shimizu K, Igarasi A. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification. Bristish J Ophthalmol. 98:459– 63.
dc.sourceSaad A, Gatinel D. Validation of a new scoring for the detection of early forme of keratoconus. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2012;1:100–8.
dc.sourceAmbrósio R, Ramos I, Lopes B, Canedo ALC, Price Jr F, Schallhorn S, et al. Assessing ectasia suceptibility prior to LASIK: the role of the age and residual stromal bed (RSB) in conjunction to Belin-Ambrósio deviation index (BAD-D). Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2014;73(2):75–80.
dc.sourceJones SR, Carley S, Harrison M. An introduction to power and sample size estimation. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:453–8.
dc.sourceCarley S, Dosman S, Jones SR, Harrison M. Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies. Emerg Med J. 2005;22:180–1.
dc.sourceFagan T. Nomogram for Baye’s Theorem. N Engl J Med. 2014;293(5):291.
dc.sourceKymionis G, Bouzoukis D, Diakonis V, Yoo S. Long-term results of thin corneas after refractive laser surgery. AJO. 2007;144(2):181–5.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.titleÍndice acumulativo de riesgo (nice) como prueba diagnóstica con base en tomografía corneal por elevación en la prevención de ectasia corneal post-lasik
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución