dc.creatorIzquierdo Uribe, Adolfo
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-07T14:25:16Z
dc.date.available2018-03-07T14:25:16Z
dc.date.created2018-03-07T14:25:16Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/16191
dc.description.abstractThis article reviews the concept of “city” through an epistemological approach to the contemporary philosophical problem of the university-city relationship, with the purpose of identifying those elements of urban theories that can help to provide a critical and creative answer to the following questions: How can the contemporary philosophical problem of the university-city relationship be reviewed with scientific rigor, that is, by using theories and methods thoroughly? How to produce, justify and use knowledge to review the meaning and content of the relationship between the concepts of university campus and social sphere?In order to answer the first question, the concepts of ‘modern city’ and ‘contemporary metropolis’ are initially discussed; general elements of the relationship university-city can be found in the origins of modern cities, whereas more specific ones can be identified in the transformations of contemporary metropolis. Secondly, the author highlights the connotations of the concept of ‘modern city’ –the act of gathering groups which perform different operations—, as well as those of the concept of ‘contemporary metropolis’ –a territory where common sense becomes aberrant in the current stage of computerized globalization. Thirdly, the concept of ‘university campus’ is disintegrated into the models of a city for university students and a university for citizens; the logic behind territoriality in modern cities and contemporary metropolis is pointed out in order to show the false duality between such models and such logic.To answer the second question, the metaphoric thematization method is introduced with the purpose of: i) reviewing the concept of ‘city’, so that it is understood as a new possibility for living organisms; ii) reviewing the concept of ‘social sphere’, so as to conceive it as the arena where man’s conscious manifestations relate to each other in an unfinished process of totalization; and iii) reviewing the concept of ‘region’, so that it can be seen as a type of spatial, time, territorial, jurisdictional and functional analysis of the arena where social matters relate.Finally, a new question is raised as to whether, in fact, from the transcendence of the organic exchange of energy between man’s conscious manifestations, it is possible to put forward a regional approach from the complexity of theories as an alternative for development, as the next step to be taken after this epistemological approach to the contemporary philosophical problem of the university-city relationship. 
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.relationhttps://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/692/622
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2014 Desafíos
dc.sourceDesafíos; Vol. 13 (2005): (julio-diciembre); 206-238
dc.source2145-5112
dc.source0124-4035
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectemergentismo
dc.subjectepistemología de la cuestión regional
dc.subjectuniversidad-ciudad
dc.subjectteorías urbanas
dc.subjectalternatividad al desarrollo y complejidad
dc.title“Ciudad”: probabilidad emergente de un organismo vivo. Una aproximación epistemológica a la relación universidad-ciudad en tanto problema filosófico contemporáneo
dc.typearticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución