dc.contributorFranco Gruntorad, Germán Andrés
dc.creatorMuñoz, Maria Angelica
dc.creatorMerchan, Natalia
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-13T18:11:15Z
dc.date.available2017-02-13T18:11:15Z
dc.date.created2017-02-13T18:11:15Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/12944
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_12944
dc.description.abstractBackground Propofol is considered the drug of anesthetic induction par excellence, due to its fast onset and short duration of action, easy titration and positive profile for side effects. However, between 30% and 80% of the patients experience pain on injection of Propofol, being this the seventh disadvantage among the most important ones within the current anesthetic practiceObjective Evaluate and compare the effectiveness of diluted Propofol at 0. 5%, vs. the Modified Bier Block to decrease the pain produced by the application of Propofol during anesthetic induction in adult patients. Design A prospective, controlled, randomized and double-blind clinic experiment was conducted in adult population between 18 and 60 years, who were taken to surgery under general anesthesia in Fundación Cardioinfantil and induced with Propofol. The patients were randomly divided in three groups: Group 1, Propofol at 1%; Group 2, Propofol at 0. 5%; and Group 3, Modified Bier block Results A total of 68 patients were included in the clinical study, in which two patients were excluded due to difficult venous access and the use of a intravascular catheter 20G size that was out of the standard protocol. It was found a higher frequency of patients that reported no pain with the infusion of Propofol in group 3, in which the modified Bier block was applied, compared with the other two groups: 73, 9% in group 3 vs. 27, 3% and 19% in group 1 and 2 respectively. Conclusion Propofol at a 0, 5% concentration, diluted with normal saline solution or Ringer´s lactate, is not effective to decrease pain during the drug administration, compared to Propofol at 1% and the modified Bier block, which is the gold standard regarding pain reliever.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEspecialización en Anestesiología FCI
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.source1. Jalota L, Kalira V, George E, et al. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2011; 342:d1110.
dc.source3. Soltesz S, Diekmann M, et al. Reduced pain on injection with a 0.5% propofol emulsion During induction of anaesthesia: a prospective, randomised, double-blind and single-centre trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:000-000
dc.source4. Macario A, Weinger M, Truong P, Lee M. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are both common and important to avoid? The perspective of a panel of expert anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 1085-91.
dc.source5. Tan CH, Onsiong MK. Pain on injection of propofol. Anaesthesia 1998; 53:468-476
dc.source6. Lee P, Russell WJ. Preventing pain on injection of propofol: a comparison between lignocaine pre-treatment and lignocaine added to propofol. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004;32:482-4.
dc.source7. Kang HJ, Kwon MY, Choi BM, et al. Clinical factors affecting the pain on injection of propofol. KJAE 2010; 58 (3): 239-243
dc.source7. Tariq MA, Kamran M. Incidence of pain on propofol injection and efficacy of addition of lignocaine or selecting big vein or both combined in reducing it: a randomized control trial. J Postgrad Med Inst 2006;20:8-11.
dc.source8. Picard P, Tramer MR. Prevention of pain on injection with propofol: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 2000;90:963-9.
dc.source9. Aggarwal S, Kumar M, Sharma V. A single-centre randomized-controlled trial to study effect of dilution on propofol induced injection pain at injection site. Saudi JA 2011; 5:282-85
dc.source11. Mangar D, Holak E. Tourniquet at 55mm Hg Followed by Intravenous Lidocaine diminishes Hand Pain associated with Propofol Injection. Anesth Analg 1992;74:250-2
dc.source10. Holak E, Mangar D. Modified Bier Block abolishes Local Pain associated with propofol injection. Anesthesiology 1991; 75:A732
dc.source12. Massad IM, Abu-Ali HM, Abu-Halaweh SA, et al. Venous occlusion with lidocaine for preventing propofol induced pain, A prospective double-bind randomized study. Saudi Med J 2006; 7:997-1000
dc.source13. Walker BJ, Neal JM, et al. Lidocaine pretreatment with tourniquet versus Lidocaine-Propofol Admixture for attenuating Propofol Injection Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011; 36:41-45
dc.source14. Doenicke AW, Roizen MF, Rau J, et al. Reducing pain during propofol injection: the role of the solvent. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:472–474.
dc.source15. Fujii Y, Itakura M. A comparison of pretreatment with fentanyl and lidocaine preceded by venous occlusion for reducing Pain on Injection of propofol: A prospective, randomized, Double- Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in adult Japanese Surgical Patients. J Clin Thera 2009: 31:10.
dc.source1. Sethi N, et al. prevention of Propofol pain: a comparative study. M.E.J Anesth 2009: 20 (1)
dc.source17. Breivik E, et al. A comparison of Pain Rating Scales by sampling from Clinical Trial Data. Clinical Journal of Pain 2000; 16:1 22-28.
dc.source18. Soltész, S et al. Effect of a 0.5% Dilution of Propofol on Pain on Injectionduring Induction of Anesthesia in Children. Anesthesiology 1 2007, Vol.106, 80-84.
dc.source19. Kaya, S et al. Lidocaine for prevention of propofol injection-induced Pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, Controlled study of the effect of duration of venous Occlusion with a tourniquet in adults. Current Therapeutic Research, February 2008. Vol. 69, 1; 29-35.
dc.source20. Picard, P et al. Prevention of Pain on Injection with Propofol: A Quantitative Systematic Review. Anesthesia and Analgesia, April 2000. Vol. 90, 4;963-9.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectPropofol
dc.subjectBloqueo Modificado de BIer
dc.subjectPropool 0.5%
dc.titleEl propofol al 0.5% no es efectivo para la disminución del dolor a la administración
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución