Resultados de la cirugía laparoscópica comparada con la cirugía abierta en el cáncer colorrectal. Revisión sistemática

dc.contributorMorón Duarte, Lina Sofía
dc.creatorVallejo Quintero, Jorge
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-07T16:16:04Z
dc.date.available2016-03-07T16:16:04Z
dc.date.created2016-03-07T16:16:04Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/11792
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_11792
dc.description.abstractBackground Colorectal cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide. It has raised the use of laparoscopic surgery as an alternative in treatment, however there are concerns about its effect on mortality. Objective To determine the effect of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery on survival in the management of colorectal cancer patients. Methods We performed a systematic review of the. The search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Cochrane library and registration of clinical trials data. A qualitative and quantitative analysis was performed. Results We included a total of 24 studies. Laparoscopic surgery was not associated with increased mortality (RR 0.94 95% CI 0.8, 1.11) or greater tumor recurrence (RR 0.74 95% CI 0.40, 1.37).) Compared with open surgery. Laparoscopic surgery reduces the need for blood transfusions and hospitalization time. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery shows similar results in terms of mortality and tumor recurrence compared with open surgery. Hospitalization time and transfusion requirements are lower in laparoscopic surgery which is higher than open surgery.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEspecialización en Cirugía General
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.sourceFerlay J. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. International Journal of cancer. 2010; 127: p. 2893–971
dc.sourceLabianca R, Merelli B. Screening and diagnosis for colorectal cancer: present and future. Tumori. 2010; 96(6): p. 889–901.
dc.sourceJenkins N, Roth S, Jhonson J, Pofahl W. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Indications and Techniques. Current Surgery. 2005; 62(3): p. 319-323.
dc.sourceDavid L, Sang L, Govind N. Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign and Malignant Colorectal Diseases. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2012; 22(3): p. 165-174
dc.sourceNandakumar G, Fleshman J. Laparoscopy for Rectal cancer. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America. 2010; 19(4): p. 793-802.
dc.sourceGUIMARAES RM, ROCHA PGM, MUZI CD, RAMOS RdS. INCREASE INCOME AND MORTALITY OF COLORRECTAL CANCER IN BRAZIL, 2001-2009. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia. 2013; 50(1): p. 64-69.
dc.sourceStang A, Stabenow R, Stegmaier C, Eisinger B, Bischof-Hammes E, Jöckel KH. Unexplained inversion of the incidence ratio of colon and rectal cancer among men in East germany. A time trend analysis including 147.790 cases. European journal of Epidemiology. 2007; 22(4): p. 245-256.
dc.sourceMurillo Moreno R, Piñeros Petersen M, Hernández Suárez G. Atlas de Mortalidad por cáncer en Colombia Bogotá: Ministerio de la protección Social-Instituto Nacional de Cancerología; 2003
dc.sourcePiñeros Petersen M, Pardo Ramos C, Gamboa Garay O, Hernández Suárez G. Atlas de Mortalidad por cáncer en Colombia Bogota: Ministerio de la Protección social-Instituto Nacional de Cancerología; 2010.
dc.sourceAustin H, Henley J, King J, Richardson L, Eheman C. Changes in colorectal cancer incidence rates in young and older adults in the United States: what does it tell us about screening. Cancer causes & control. 2014; 25(2): p. 191-201.
dc.sourceSirikurnpiboon S, Jivapaisarnpong P. Single-Access Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery Is Technically Feasible. Minim Invasive Surgery. 2013; 2013: p. 687134
dc.sourceKrane M, Fichera A. Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: Where do we stand? World Journal Gastroenterology. 2012; 18(46): p. 6747–6755
dc.sourceMaughan N, Quirke P. Modern management of colorectal cancer-a pathologist´s view. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2003; 92: p. 11-19.
dc.sourceBoyle P, Langman J. ABC of colorectal cancer. Epidemiology. British Medical Journal. 2000; 321: p. 805-808.
dc.sourceCortés A, Bravo L, García L. Incidencia, mortalidad y supervivencia por cáncer colorrectal en Cali, Colombia, 1962-2012. Salud pública de México. 2014; 56(5): p. 457-464.
dc.sourceKim H, Baik SJ, Kim K, Oh CR, Lee SI. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Colorectal Adenoma in 14,932 Koreans Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy. The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013; 62(2): p. 104-110
dc.sourceMa Y, Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P, Shi C, Zou Y, et al. Obesity and risk of clorectal cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies. Plos One. 2013; 8(1): p. e53916.
dc.sourceHjartaker A, Aagnes B, Robsahm T, Langseth H, Bray F, Larsen K. Subsite-specific dietary risk factors for colorectal cancer: a review of cohort studies. Journal of Oncology. 2013; 2013: p. 703854.
dc.sourceKekelidze M, D´Errico L, Pansini M, Tyndall A, Hohmann J. Colorectal cancer: Current imaging methods and future perspectives for the diagnosis, staging and therapeutic response evaluation. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013; 19(46): p. 8502-8514.
dc.sourcePascoe S, Veitch C, Crossland L, Beilby J, Spigelman A, Stubbs J, et al. Patients’ experiences of referral for colorectal cancer. BMC Family practice. 2013;(14): p. 124
dc.sourceKontovounisios C, Kinross J, Tan E, Brown G, Rasheed S, Tekkis P. Complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Colorectal Disease. 2015; 17(1): p. 7-16.
dc.sourceBannura G DCC, Cumsille M, Barrera A, J CP, Soto Dea. Resultados de la quimioterapia adyuvante en cancer de colon. Rev Chil Cir. 2008; 60(5): p. 403-9.
dc.sourceKosinski L, Habr-Gama A, Ludwig K, Perez R. Shifting concepts in rectal cancer management. Canadian Cancer Journal Clinics. 2012; 62: p. 173-202.
dc.sourceJones W, Charles T, Herman J, Abdel-Wahab M, Azad N, al e. ACR appropiateness criteria. Radiation Oncology. 2012; 7: p. 161.
dc.sourceSewitch M, Barkun A. Fighting colorectal cancer with information technology. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2011; 183: p. 1053.
dc.sourceShussman N, Wexner S. Current status of laparoscopy for the treatment of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(41): p. 15125-34.
dc.sourceBianchi P, Luca F, Biffi R. The role of the robotic technique in minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer. ecancermedicalscience. 2013; 7: p. 357.
dc.sourceGlimelius B. Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013; 19(46): p. 8489-8501.
dc.sourceArezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, Verra M, Morino M. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical endoscopy. 2013; 27(5): p. 1485-502.
dc.sourceAziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T, Purkayastha S PP, al e. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Annals of surgical oncology. 2006; 13(3): p. 413-24.
dc.sourceLiang X, Hou S, Liu H, Li Y, Jiang B, Bai W, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Laparoscopic Resection Versus Open Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled Trial from China. Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. 2011; 21(5): p. 381-385.
dc.sourceJadad A, Moore R, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds D. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials. 1996; 17(1): p. 1-12.
dc.sourceHartling L, Milne A, Hamm M, Vandermeer B, Ansari M, al e. Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66(9): p. 982-93.
dc.sourceCenter of evidence based medicine. Levels of evidence. [Online].; 2009 [cited 2014 Enero 28. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/?o=1025.
dc.sourceBorenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H. Introduction to meta-analysis Londres: Wiley; 2009.
dc.sourceAlonso Araujo S, Henrique da Silva A, Caserta F, Habr-Gama A, Blanco R, de Paris P, et al. Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med S Paulo. 2003; 58(3): p. 133-140.
dc.sourceArteaga I, Díaz H, Martín A, López-Tomassetti E, Arranz J, Carillo A. A comparative clinical study of short-term results of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer during the learning curve. International Journal of Colorrectal diseases. 2006; 21: p. 590-595.
dc.sourceBraga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50: p. 464-471.
dc.sourceGreenblatt D, Rajamanickam V, Pugely A, Heise C, Foley E, Kennedy G. Short-Term Outcomes after Laparoscopic-Assisted Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: Results from the ACS NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 212(5): p. 844-854.
dc.sourceGuillou P, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne D, Smith A, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365: p. 1718-26.
dc.sourceBaik S, Gincherman M, Mutch M, Birnbaum E, Fleshman J. Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Patients With Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Long-Term Survival. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54: p. 6-14.
dc.sourceJayne D, Guillou P, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith A, et al. Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007; 25: p. 3061-3068.
dc.sourceKang S, Park J, Jeong S, Nam B, Choi H, Kim D, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11: p. 637-645.
dc.sourceKhaikin M, Bashankaev B, Person B, Cera S, Sands D, Weiss E, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer. Patients outcome and oncology adecuacy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009; 19: p. 118-122.
dc.sourceLun W, Poon J, Fan J, Oswens S. Survival following laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012; 27: p. 1077-1085.
dc.sourceLeung K, Kwok S, Lau W, Meng W, Chung C, Lai P, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2000; 14: p. 67-70.
dc.sourceLujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos M, Parrilla P. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. British journal of surgery. 2009; 96: p. 982-989.
dc.sourceMorino M, Allaix M, Giraudo G, Corno F, Garrone C. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19: p. 1460-1467.
dc.sourceNg S, Leung W, Wong C, Hon S, Mak T, Ngo D, et al. Quality of life after laparoscopic vs open sphincterpreserving resection for rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19: p. 4764-4773.
dc.sourceNg S, Leung K, Lee J, Yiu R, Li J, Hon S. Long-Term Morbidity and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Anterior Resection for Upper Rectal Cancer: Ten-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52(4): p. 558-566.
dc.sourceNg S, Leung K, Lee J, Yiu R, Li J. Laparoscopic-Assisted Versus Open Abdominoperineal 60 Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Annals of surgical oncology. 2008; 15(9): p. 2418-2425.
dc.sourcePrakash K, Varma D, Rajan M, Kamlesh N, Zacharias P, Ganesh R. Laparoscopic colonic resection for rectosigmoid colonic tumours: a retrospectiva analysis and comparison with open resection. Indian J surg. 2010; 72(4): p. 318-322.
dc.sourceZhou Z, Hu M, Li Y, Lei W, Yu Y, Cheng Z, et al. Laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: p. 1211-1215.
dc.sourceAndersson J, Abis G, Gellerstedt M, Angenete E, Angeras U, Cuesta M, et al. Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II). BJS. 2014; 101: p. 1272-1279.
dc.sourcevan der Pas M, Haglind E, Cuesta M, A F, Lacy A, Hop W, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: p. 210-218.
dc.sourceJeong S, Park J, Nam B, Kim S, Kang S, Lim S. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15: p. 767-774.
dc.sourceFranchini A, Tavares J, Matos D. Treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma by laparoscopy and conventional route: a brazilian comparative study on operative time, postoperative complications, oncological radicality and survival. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2011; 38(4): p. 245-251.
dc.sourceLelong B, Bege T, Esterni B, Guiramand J, Turrini O, Moutardier V, et al. Short-Term Outcome After Laparoscopic or Open Restorative Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Comparative Cohort Study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006; 50: p. 176-183.
dc.sourceRoscio F, Bertoglio C, De luca A, Frigerio A, Galli F, Scandroglio I. Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. JSLS. 2001; 15(3): p. 315-21.
dc.sourceFetti A, Zaharie F, Geza M, Graur F, Scurtu R, Seiceanu R, et al. Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term. Chirurgia. 2012; 107: p. 730-737.
dc.sourcePietro P, Risati R, Bona S, Rottoli M, Elmore U, Ceriani C, et al. Laparoscopic Surgery in Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Analysis of Patient Survival and Outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50: p. 2047-2053.
dc.sourceKhan S, Mermer M, Myers E, Sandhu H. The roles of funding source, clinical trial outcome, and quality of reporting in orthopedic surgery literature. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2008; 37: p. E205.
dc.sourceDaher R, Chouillard E, Panis Y. New trends in colorectal surgery: Single port and natural orifice 61 techniques. World J Gastroentero. 2014; 20: p. 18104-18120
dc.sourceChan D, Chong C, Lieske B, Tan K. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: what is the evidence? Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: p. 347810.
dc.sourceBalén E, Suárez J, Ariceta I, Oronoz B, Herrera J, Lera J. Cirugía laparoscópica en las enfermedades colorrectales. Anales Sis San Navarra. 2005; 28(suppl 3): p. 67-80.
dc.sourceCelentano V. Need for simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training. World J Gastrointest Sur. 2015; 7(9): p. 392-401.
dc.sourceLai J, Law W. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Br Med Bull. 2012; 104: p. 61-89.
dc.sourceSchiphorst A, Verweij N, Pronk A, Borel Rinkes I, Hamaker M. Non-surgical complications after laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer - A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2015; 41(9): p. 1118-27.
dc.sourceXie Y, Fang K, Ma W, Shi Z, Ren X. Risk of postoperative deep venous thrombosis in patients with colorectal cancer treated with open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Indian Journal of cancer. 2015; 51(suppl 2): p. e42-4.
dc.sourceLim R, Yang T, Chua T. Postoperative bladder and sexual function in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open resection of rectal cancer. Techniques in coloproctology. 2014; 18(11): p. 993-1002.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectCáncer colorrectal
dc.subjectcirugía laparoscópica
dc.subjectcirugía
dc.subjectcoloproctología
dc.titleResultados de la cirugía laparoscópica comparada con la cirugía abierta en el cáncer colorrectal. Revisión sistemática
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución