Elements for a Theory on Justice: A Comparison between John Rawls and Amartya Sen

dc.creatorHoyos Gómez, Diana
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-07T15:02:30Z
dc.date.available2018-03-07T15:02:30Z
dc.date.created2018-03-07T15:02:30Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/17570
dc.description.abstractThis essay aims to establish a comparison between the central elements present in the theory of justice of John Rawls and Amartya Sen, as well as analyze some of the weaknesses and contributions of these theoretical proposals. This work focuses on four topics that are core to the discussion on the theory of justice: circumstances to be considered in any evaluation of justice, principles of justice and rules of combination, informational bases, and inequalities admitted by the evaluations of justice. 
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.relationhttps://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/394/338
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2014 Desafíos
dc.sourceDesafíos; Vol. 18 (2008): (enero-junio); 156-181
dc.source2145-5112
dc.source0124-4035
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectJohn Rawls
dc.subjectteoría de la justicia
dc.subjectAmartya Sen
dc.subjectdesigualdad
dc.titleElementos para una teoría de la justicia: una comparación entre John Rawls y Amartya Sen
dc.titleElements for a Theory on Justice: A Comparison between John Rawls and Amartya Sen
dc.typearticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución