dc.contributor | Niño González, Jorge Ernesto | |
dc.creator | Hasbón Carreño, Sara Lucía | |
dc.creator | Monsalve Pinto, Diego Leonardo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-01-11T04:37:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-01-11T04:37:34Z | |
dc.date.created | 2013-01-11T04:37:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier | http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/4066 | |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_4066 | |
dc.description.abstract | The labor induction has demonstrated a simultaneous increment on Caesarean operation ratios, specifically in nulliparous patients with clinically unfavorable cervix. Although widely used, the clinical evaluation of the cervix is a subjective method; for this reason, the purpose of the present manuscript is to determine the usefulness of the cervix length ultrasound measurement, compared with the Bishop score, in the prediction of labor induction success in nulliparous patients at Hospital Universitario Clinica San Rafael Obstetrics Department.
Materials and methods: We describe an observational study with the evaluation of a prospective cohort of 80 pregnant patients, all of them were performed ultrasound and clinical evaluation of the cervix before the labor induction.
Results: The bivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with cervix length >20 mm are 1.57 times more likely to end in caesarean delivery (RR 1.57 IC95% 1.03-2.39 p <0.05). Similarly, patients with Bishop score 0 to 3 are 2.33 more likely to end in Caesarean delivery (RR 2.33 IC95% 1.28-4.23 p <0.05). Binary logistic regression showed that maternal age and cervical length were the only independent parameters with statistical significance for the prediction of labor induction success.
Conclusions: Cervix length ultrasound measurement is more useful than clinical evaluation in the prediction of labor induction success in nulliparous patients. | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Universidad del Rosario | |
dc.publisher | Especialización en Ginecología y Obstericia | |
dc.publisher | Facultad de Medicina | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | Abierto (Texto completo) | |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia | |
dc.rights | EL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. | |
dc.source | RCOG, 2008. Induction of labour. En: RCOG, Evidence Based Clinical Guideline No. 9. London: Royal College Obtetricians and Gynaecologist Clinical Support Unit | |
dc.source | Ramseya P, Raminb K, Raminc S. Labor induction. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;12:463-473 | |
dc.source | Torricelli M, Novembri R, Voltolini C. Biochemical and biophysical predictors of the response to the induction of labor in nulliparous postterm pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010;203:1-6 | |
dc.source | Meijer-hoogeveen M, Roos C, Arabin B. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement for cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009;33:213-220 | |
dc.source | Hull, A. Placenta accrete and postpartum hemorrhage. Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010;53:228-236 | |
dc.source | Tan P, Suguna S. Ultrasound and clinical predictors for cesarean delivery after labor induction at term. Australian Journal in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006;46:505-509 | |
dc.source | Hermus M, Verhoeven C, Fiedeldeji C. Comparison of induction of labor and expectant management in postterm pregnancy: a matched cohort study. Journal of Midwifery Womens Health 2009;54:351-6. | |
dc.source | Strobel E, Sladkevicius P, Rovas L. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;28:298–305. | |
dc.source | Maitra N, Sharma D, Agarwal S. Transvaginal measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labour. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009;29:388-391 | |
dc.source | Bueno B, San-Frutos L, Perez T. The labor induction: integrated clinical and sonographic variables that predict the outcome. Journal of Perinatology 2007;27:4-8 | |
dc.source | Kang W, Park K, Kim S, Shin D, Hong D. Degree of cervical shortening after initial induction of labor as a predictor of subsequent successful induction. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010;36:749–754 | |
dc.source | Gomez A, Garcia F, Herrera J. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction. Acta in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007;86:799-804 | |
dc.source | Keepanasseril A, Suri V, Bagga R. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women. Australian Journal in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007;47:389-393 | |
dc.source | Rane M, Guirgis R, Nicolaides K. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length. Journal of Matern and Fetal Medicine 2005;17:315-322 | |
dc.source | Torbjørn M., Inger O, Heien C. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score? Acta in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009;88:325-331 | |
dc.source | Ahner R, Egarter C, Kiss H. Fetal fibronectin as a selection criterion for induction of term labor. American Journal Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995;173:1513-1517. | |
dc.source | Tam W, Tai S, Rogers M. Prediction of cervical response to prostaglandin E-2 using fetal fibronectin. Acta Obstetric Gynecol Scand 1999;78:861-865. | |
dc.source | Hatfield, A. Sonographic cervical assessment to predict the success of labor induction: a systematic review with metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007; 197:186-192 | |
dc.source | Elghorori M, Hassan I, Dartey W. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labor. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006;26:521-526 | |
dc.source | Andersen H, Nugent C, Wanty S. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990;163:859-67. | |
dc.source | McKenna D, Costa S, Samuels P. Prostaglandin E2 cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor. A randomized prospective trial establishing the efficacy of outpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and labor induction. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;94:11-14. | |
dc.source | Iams J, Johnson F, Sonek J, Sachs L, Gebauer C, Samuels P. Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995;172:1097-106. | |
dc.source | Stenlund P, Ekman G, Aedo A, Bygdeman M. Induction of labor with mifepristone: a randomized, double-blind study versus placebo. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78:793-798. | |
dc.source | instname:Universidad del Rosario | |
dc.source | reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR | |
dc.subject | Longitud cervical | |
dc.subject | Induccion de trabajo de parto | |
dc.subject | Puntaje de Bishop | |
dc.subject | Cesarea | |
dc.subject | Parto vaginal | |
dc.title | Longitud cervical como predictor de exito en induccion de trabajo de parto en nuliparas | |
dc.type | masterThesis | |