dc.contributorClínica Jurídica Internacional
dc.creatorAlbarracin Barrera, Juan
dc.creatorTole Ramirez, Maria Paula
dc.creatorGiraldo Lasso, Maria Camila
dc.creatorMurillo, Max Sebastian
dc.creatorDominguez Fernandez, Macarena
dc.creatorGutiérrez Romero, Andrés Esteban
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-17T12:22:05Z
dc.date.available2017-05-17T12:22:05Z
dc.date.created2017-05-17T12:22:05Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/13381
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_13381
dc.description.abstractDominic Ongwen - one of the four Lieutenants of the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) -, currently is being prosecuted by the ICC for crimes against humanity and war crimes, including attempted murder, torture, cruel treatment, inhumane acts, slavery, attacks against personal dignity, looting, destruction of property and persecution. Due to the fact that Dominic Ongwen was abducted and subjected to a brutal training at the age of ten (10) by the group of which he later became, until his detention, a Lieutenant (the highest position in the LRA below the Commander-in-Chief Joseph Kony), the Defense has alleged, pursuant to article 31(1)(a) of the ICC Statute, the defense of mental insanity. Article 31(1)(a) of the ICC Statute provides the following two elements of the mental insanity defense: (i) the existence of a disease or mental defect (including its severity and its development over time); and (ii) that such disease or defect caused, at the time in which the alleged crimes were committed, the deprivation of the defendant´s capacity (a) “to appreciate the unlawfulness or nature of his conduct”; or (b) “to control his conduct according to the requirements of law”. Insanity constitutes an excluding circumstance only if both elements are fully proven by the Defense. If only one of these elements is partially proven, insanity may only be considered as a mitigating circumstance or factor in the sentence.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherFacultad de Jurisprudencia
dc.relationClínica Jurídica Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.sourceAmbos, Kai, 2004. Estudios de derecho penal internacional, 473-474. Montalban, Caracas: Universidad Católica Andrés Bello
dc.sourceAmbos, Kai. Treatise On International Criminal Law. 2013. New York: Oxford University Press
dc.sourceICC. Rules of procedure and evidence
dc.sourceWerle Gerhard et al. Tratado de derecho penal internacional. 2011. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch
dc.sourceKnoops, Geert-Jant Alexander. Defenses in Contemporary International Criminal Law. 2007. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007
dc.sourceTrifftterer, Otto and Kai Ambos. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court - A Commentary. 2016. Beck/Hart
dc.sourceICC. 2003. Prosecutor v. Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic, Esad Landzo, Zejnil Delalic (IT-96-21
dc.sourceCamargo, Pedro Pablo. 1989. Manual de Derecho Penal Internacional. Bogotá: TEMIS
dc.sourceKeedy, Edwin R. 1952. Irresistible impulse as a defense in the criminal law. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Law Review
dc.sourceUnited States Sentencing Commission. 2013. Guidelines Manual. http://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/guidelines-manual/2013/manual-pdf/2013_Guidelines_Manual_Full.pdf
dc.sourceICC. 2016. Bemba sentencing Decision; Lubanga Sentencing Decision; and Katanga Sentencing Decision
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectPrincipios y normas del derecho penal internacional
dc.subjectDominic Ongwen
dc.subjectLRA
dc.subjectIncapacidad Mental
dc.subjectEnfermedad mental
dc.subjectFalta de capacidad
dc.subjectCPI
dc.subjectCorte Penal Internacional
dc.subjectEstatuto de Roma
dc.subjectCrímenes de Guerra
dc.subjectCrímenes de Lesa Humanidad
dc.titleLa defensa de incapacidad mental en el Estatuto de la Corte Penal Internacional y su posible aplicación en el caso contra Dominic Ongwen
dc.typeworkingPaper


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución