dc.creatorRodríguez-Morales, Federmán
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-07T14:25:11Z
dc.date.available2018-03-07T14:25:11Z
dc.date.created2018-03-07T14:25:11Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/16146
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this article is to explore three options of citizens within liberal political philosophy, as well as their main characteristics and theoretical sources. Those options are: the obligation to obey the law (the civil obedience as an obligation), the moral duty to obey the law (the civil obedience as a “must be”), and the civil disobedience. The author points out that the “liberal” concept can be defined in an ontological sense because the citizen is defined as an individual entity.Given that the civil disobedience is the most complex concept analyzed in this article, it is suggested an interesting exercise in order to define it. This concept is constructed according to logical contradiction. Thus, the idea of “non-civil disobedience” is used to explore the civil disobedience conceptual bounderies. 
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.relationhttps://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/670/600
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2014 Desafíos
dc.sourceDesafíos; Vol. 11 (2004): (julio-diciembre); 243-262
dc.source2145-5112
dc.source0124-4035
dc.subjectFilosofía política liberal; desobediencia civil; obediencia civil como obligación; obediencia civil como deber moral; no desobediencia civil
dc.titleLas opciones de los ciudadanos en la filosofía política liberal
dc.typearticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución