The Science of Transdisciplinarity or Complex Politics: The Borders between Law and Politics

Abstract

This article analyzes the position of two legal points of view regarding politics. One of the positions is critical, in the sense of associating politics with power, arbitrariness, discretion and marginalizing issues of justice, i.e., issues which are not part of law according to positivism. On the other hand, trialism incorporates axiological dimensions, the scientific analysis in the legal world, and ensures adequacy and equality. The second position is less critical of politics and sees it as an improvement of law in terms of coexistence and love. Politics allows understanding, participation, communication, features which law often lacks, even more so if it is mere regulations. The position of complex thinking, which suggests neither negating nor reducing a position into another, but a dialogical coexistence of antagonists in a unit that integrates them, proposes complementing these two positions in the unity of the science of transdisciplinarity. Since the human problem cannot be tackled by any discipline in isolation, the science of transdisciplinarity will be able to coordinate the contributions of each of the sciences in order to solve the problem of human destiny.