dc.contributorRodríguez Alvira, Francisco José
dc.contributorTovar Cuevas, José Rafael
dc.creatorFlor Herrera, Andrés Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-12T15:12:10Z
dc.date.available2014-02-12T15:12:10Z
dc.date.created2014-02-12T15:12:10Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/4937
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_4937
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Several features can affect the visual prognosis after surgically resolve of retinal detachment. There unobservable characteristics by human eye alone but by optical coherence tomography that relate to visual recovery. Objective: To describe clinical and tomographic characteristics in pre and post-operative periods of eyes that have suffered macula off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and its relationship to the quality of visual recovery after successful surgery considered. Materials and Methods: A descriptive prospective study which compares some perioperative characteristics into three diferents times, one before and two after surgery (3 and 6 months) of 24 eyes with macula off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment operated by scleral buckling combined with pars plana vitrectomy . Results: Visual recovery better than or equal to 0.397 logMAR (20/50) was given in 41.7% of eyes and 16.7% reached 0.301 logMAR visual acuity (20/40). Five patients did not achieve greater gain than five lines of sight. Absent submacular fluid was observed in the most of eyes that recovered more than five lines as those with preserved ellipsoid. Neuroepitelium regularity and edema in the postoperative period showed no clear behavior regarding visual recovery as the height of the macular detachment, and the number of hit quadrants. Better visual recovery was more frequent in those with less than five weeks of retinal detachment. Conclusions: Shortr delay to 5 weeks in the resolution of retinal abruption, conservation of the ellipsoid and the absence of submacular fluid in the postoperative period was observed more frequently in eyes with better visual recovery.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEspecialización en Oftalmología
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma.
dc.sourceAbouzeid H, Wolfensberger TJ , Macular recovery after retinal detachment, Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2006: 84: 597–605
dc.sourceWilkinson CP. Retinal Detachment. Ryan SJ: Retina. Third Edition. St Louis, Elsevier Mosby Ed. 2006
dc.sourceAmerican Academy of Ophthalmology. Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 12: Retina and Vitreous Elsevier 2008
dc.sourceRegillo CD, Bensosn WE. Retinal Detachment : Diagnosis and Management . 3rd ed. Pjiladelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins : 1998:60-66
dc.sourcevan Overdam KA, Bettink-Remeijer M, Klaver CC, Mulder PG, Moll AC, van Meurs JC. Symptoms and Findings Predictive for the Development of New Retinal Breaks. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(4):479-484.
dc.sourceTasman WS. Duane’s Clinical Ophthalmology. [CD ROM]. Philadelphia: Lippincott Willians & Wilkins; 2003
dc.sourceRoss WH, Visual recovery after macula-off retinal detachment, Eye (2002) 16, 440–446
dc.sourceThe Repair of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Ophthalmology 1 August 1996 Volume 103 issue 8 Pages 1313-1324)
dc.sourceBurton TC. Recovery of visual acuity after retinal detachment involving the macula. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1982;80:475-97
dc.sourceWilkinson CP Visual results following scleral buckling for retinal detachments sparing the macula. Retina 1981; I: 113-6.
dc.sourceTani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without macular involvement treated with scleral buckling. Am J Ophthalmol 1980;90:503-8
dc.sourceHagimura N, Suto K, Iida T & Kishi S: Optical coherence tomography of the neurosensory retina in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2000: 129: 186–190
dc.sourceSchocket LS, Witkin AJ, Fujimoto JG, et al. Ultra-high- resolution optical coherence tomography in patients with de- creased visual acuity after retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmology 2006;113:666–672
dc.sourceDoyle E, Herbert EN, Bunce C, Williamson TH, Laidlaw DAH. How effective is macula-off retinal detachment surgery. Might good outcome be predicted? Eye. 2007;21:534-40
dc.sourceSullivan PM, Luff AJ, Aylward GW. Results of primary retinal reattachment surgery: a prospective audit. Eye 1997; 11: 869–871.
dc.sourceComer MB, Newman DK, George ND, Martin KR, Tom BDM, Moore AT. Who should manage primary retinal detachments? Eye 2000; 14: 572–578
dc.sourceLaatikainen L, Harju H, Tolppanen E. Post-operative outcome in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmologica 1985; 63: 647–65
dc.sourceLecleire-Collet A, Muraine M, Menard JFm Evaluation of macular changes before and after successful retinal detachment surgery using Stratus-optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:176–179.
dc.sourceWolfensberger T , Gonvers M , Optical coherence tomography in the evaluation of incomplete visual acuity recovery after macula-off retinal detachments. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002: 240: 85–89
dc.sourceTani P, Robertson D, Langworthy A (1981): Prognosis for central vision and anatomic reattachment in rhegmatogenous RD with macula detached. Am J Ophthal- mol 92: 611–620.
dc.sourceBonnet M, Bievelez B, Noel A, Bensoussan B, Pingault C Fluorescein angiography after retinal de- tachment microsurgery. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1983 221:35–40
dc.sourceRoss WH, Kozy D, Visual recovery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 1998, 105:2149–2153
dc.sourceDunnington J Macnie J : Detach- ment of the retina: report on operative results in 150 cases. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1934: 39: 133–144.
dc.sourceDavidorf FH, Havener W, Lang J, Macular vision following retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmic Surg 1975 6: 74–81.
dc.sourceHartz AJ, Burton TC, Gottlieb MS, McCarty DJ, Williams DF, Prescott A & Klein P (1992): Outcome and cost analysis of scheduled versus emergency scleral buck- ling surgery. Ophthalmology 99: 1358– 1363
dc.sourceMachemer R Experimental RD in the owl monkey. II. Histology of retina and pigment epithelium. Am J Ophthalmol 1968 ;66: 396–410
dc.sourceMachemer R, Experimental RD in the owl monkey. IV. The reattached retina. Am J Ophthalmol 1968: 66: 1075–1091
dc.sourceLecleire-Collet A, Muraine M, Menard JF & Brasseur G Predictive visual out- come after macula-off retinal detachment surgery using optical coherence tomogra- phy. Retina 2005: 25: 44–53
dc.sourceWolfensberger T, Foveal Reattachment after Macula-Off Retinal Detachment Occurs Faster after Vitrectomy than after Buckle Surgery, Ophthalmology 2004;111:1340–1343
dc.sourceNakanishi H, Hangai M, Unoki N, et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging of the detached macula in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2009;29(2):232–242
dc.sourceYang L, Bula D, Arroyo JG & Chen DF (2004): Preventing retinal detachment-asso- ciated photoreceptor cell loss in Bax-defi- cient mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45: 648–654
dc.sourceWakabayashi T, Oshima Y, Fujimoto H, et al. Foveal microstructure and visual acuity after retinal detachment repair. Imaging 
analysis by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2009;116:519-528
dc.sourceSmith A.J., Telander D.G., Zawadzki R.J., Choi S.S., Morse L.S., Werner J.S., Park S.S. High-resolution Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Microperimetric Findings After Macula-off Retinal Detachment Repair (2008) Ophthalmology, 115
dc.sourceBenson SE, Schlottman PB, Bunce C, et al. Optical coherence tomography analysis of the macula after scleral buckle surgery for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2007;114:108–12
dc.sourceWolfensberger TJ. Foveal reattachment after macula-off retinal detachment occurs faster after vitrectomy than after buckle surgery. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1340 –3
dc.sourceBaba T, Hirose A, Moriyama M, Mochizuki M. Tomographic image and visual recovery of acute macula-off rhegmatog- enous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:576 – 81
dc.sourceYong-kyu K, Se Joon Woo, Kyu Hyung Park, Young Suk Yu, and Hum Chung, Comparison of Persistent Submacular Fluid in Vitrectomy and Scleral Buckle Surgery for Macula-Involving Retinal Detachment, Am J Ophthalmology 2010, 149:623 -629
dc.sourceSpeicher MA, Fu AD, Martin JP, Von Fricken MA et al. Primary vitrectomy alone for repair of detachments following cataract surgery. Retina 2000; 20: 459–464
dc.sourceAboimura N, Iida T, Suto K, Kishi S Persistent foveal retinal detachment after successful thegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2002, 133: 516–520
dc.sourceCavallini G, Masini C, Volante V, Pupino A, Campi L, Pelloni S. Visual recovery after scleral buckling for macula-off retinal 
detachments: an optical coherence tomography study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007;17:790-796
dc.sourceKim Y, Woo S, Park K, Yu, Chung H. Comparison of Persistent Submacular Fluid in Vitrectomy and Scleral Buckle Surgery for Macula-Involving Retinal Detachment (2010) American Journal of Ophthalmology, 149 (4)
dc.sourceBenson SE, Schlottmann PG, Bunce C, Xing W, Charteris DG. Optical coherence tomography analysis of the macula after vitrectomy surgery for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1179 –1183
dc.sourceSeo J, Woo S, Park K, Yu Y, Chung H. Influence of persistent submacular fluid on visual outcome after successful scleral buckle surgery for macula-off retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:915-922
dc.sourceSachin Mehta, Kevin J. Blinder, Gaurav K. Shah, M. Gilbert Grand, Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology / Journal Canadien d'Ophtalmologie, Volume 46, Issue 3, June 2011, Pages 237-241
dc.sourceSabates FN, Sabates R, Lee K, Ziemianski Cm Macular changes after RD surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1989, 108: 22–29.
dc.sourceBurton TC, Lambert R Jr, A pre- dictive model for visual recovery following retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmology 85: 619–625.
dc.sourceCleary PE & Leaver P, Macular abnormalities in the reattached retina. Br J Ophthalmol 1978, 62: 595–603.
dc.sourceMeredith TA, Reeser FH, Topping TM & Aaberg TMJ Cystoid macular oedema after retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmology 1980 , 87: 1090–1095
dc.sourceDoyle E, Herbert EN, Bunce C, Williamson TH, Laidlaw DAH. How effective is macula-off retinal detachment surgery. Might good outcome be predicted? Eye. 2007;21:534–540
dc.sourceMowatt L, Tarin S, Nair RG, Menon J and Price N J, Correlation of visual recovery with macular height in macula-off retinal detachments, Eye (2010) 24, 323–327; doi:10.1038/eye.2009.74
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectDesprendimiento de Retina
dc.subjectTomografía óptica coherente
dc.subjectRecuperacioón visual
dc.titleFactores asociados a recuperación visual deficiente después de cirugía exitosa para desprendimiento de retina regmatógeno
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución