dc.contributorNU. CEPAL
dc.contributorUNU. World Institute for Development Economics Research
dc.creatorOcampo, José Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-02T16:51:59Z
dc.date.available2014-01-02T16:51:59Z
dc.date.created2014-01-02T16:51:59Z
dc.date.issued2003-02
dc.identifier9211213924
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11362/7793
dc.identifierLC/L.1820-P
dc.description.abstractAbstract This paper explores the complementary use of two instruments to manage capital-account volatility in developing countries: capital account regulations and counter-cyclical prudential regulation of domestic financial intermediaries. Capital-account regulations can provide useful instruments in terms of both improving debt profiles and facilitating the adoption of (possibly temporary); counter-cyclical macroeconomic policies. Prudential regulation and supervision should take into account not only the microeconomic risks, but also the macroeconomic risks associated with boom-bust cycles. It should thus introduce counter-cyclical elements into prudential regulation and supervision, together with strict rules to prevent currency mismatches and reduce maturity mismatches. These instruments should be seen as a complement to counter-cyclical macroeconomic policies and, certainly, neither of them can nullify the risks that pro-cyclical macroeconomic policies may generate.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherECLAC
dc.relationSerie Informes y Estudios Especiales
dc.relation6
dc.titleCapital-account and counter-cyclical prudential regulations in developing countries
dc.typeTexto


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución