dc.contributor | NU. CEPAL | |
dc.contributor | UNU. World Institute for Development Economics Research | |
dc.creator | Ocampo, José Antonio | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-02T16:51:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-02T16:51:59Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014-01-02T16:51:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-02 | |
dc.identifier | 9211213924 | |
dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/11362/7793 | |
dc.identifier | LC/L.1820-P | |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract
This paper explores the complementary use of two instruments to manage capital-account volatility in developing countries: capital account regulations and counter-cyclical prudential regulation of domestic financial intermediaries. Capital-account regulations can provide useful instruments in terms of both improving debt profiles and facilitating the adoption of (possibly temporary); counter-cyclical macroeconomic policies. Prudential regulation and supervision should take into account not only the microeconomic risks, but also the macroeconomic risks associated with boom-bust cycles. It should thus introduce counter-cyclical elements into prudential regulation and supervision, together with strict rules to prevent currency mismatches and reduce maturity mismatches. These instruments should be seen as a complement to counter-cyclical macroeconomic policies and, certainly, neither of them can nullify the risks that pro-cyclical macroeconomic policies may generate. | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | ECLAC | |
dc.relation | Serie Informes y Estudios Especiales | |
dc.relation | 6 | |
dc.title | Capital-account and counter-cyclical prudential regulations in developing countries | |
dc.type | Texto | |