info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Stop Saying That It Is Wrong! Psychophysiological, Cognitive, and Metacognitive Markers of Children’s Sensitivity to Punishment
Fecha
2015-07Registro en:
González Gadea, María Luz; Scheres, Anouk; Tobón, Carlos Andrés; Damm, Juliane; Báez Buitrago, Sandra Jimena; et al.; Stop Saying That It Is Wrong! Psychophysiological, Cognitive, and Metacognitive Markers of Children’s Sensitivity to Punishment; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 10; 7; 7-2015; 1-17; e0133683
1932-6203
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
González Gadea, María Luz
Scheres, Anouk
Tobón, Carlos Andrés
Damm, Juliane
Báez Buitrago, Sandra Jimena
Huepe, David
Marino, Julián Carlos
Marder, Sandra Esther
Manes, Facundo Francisco
Abrevaya, Sofia
Ibáñez Barassi, Agustín Mariano
Resumen
Neurodevelopmental evidence suggests that children’s main decision-making strategy is to avoid options likely to induce punishment. However, the cognitive and affective factors contributing to children’s avoidance to high punishment frequency remain unknown. The present study explored psychophysiological, cognitive, and metacognitive processes associated with sensitivity to punishment frequency. We evaluated 54 participants (between 8 and 15 years old) with a modified Iowa Gambling Task for children (IGT-C) which included options with varying long-term profit and punishment frequencies. Skin conductance responses (SCRs) were recorded during this task. Additionally, we assessed IGT-C metacognitive knowledge, fluid intelligence, and executive functions. Participants exhibited behavioral avoidance and high anticipatory SCRs to options with high frequency of punishment. Moreover, age, IGT-C metacognitive knowledge, and inhibitory control were associated with individual differences in sensitivity to punishment frequency. Our results suggest that children’s preference for infrequently punished decisions is partially explained by psychophysiological signals as well as task complexity and development of cognitive control.