dc.creatorGonzález Gadea, María Luz
dc.creatorScheres, Anouk
dc.creatorTobón, Carlos Andrés
dc.creatorDamm, Juliane
dc.creatorBáez Buitrago, Sandra Jimena
dc.creatorHuepe, David
dc.creatorMarino, Julián Carlos
dc.creatorMarder, Sandra Esther
dc.creatorManes, Facundo Francisco
dc.creatorAbrevaya, Sofia
dc.creatorIbáñez Barassi, Agustín Mariano
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-11T19:13:39Z
dc.date.available2018-04-11T19:13:39Z
dc.date.created2018-04-11T19:13:39Z
dc.date.issued2015-07
dc.identifierGonzález Gadea, María Luz; Scheres, Anouk; Tobón, Carlos Andrés; Damm, Juliane; Báez Buitrago, Sandra Jimena; et al.; Stop Saying That It Is Wrong! Psychophysiological, Cognitive, and Metacognitive Markers of Children’s Sensitivity to Punishment; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 10; 7; 7-2015; 1-17; e0133683
dc.identifier1932-6203
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/41774
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.description.abstractNeurodevelopmental evidence suggests that children’s main decision-making strategy is to avoid options likely to induce punishment. However, the cognitive and affective factors contributing to children’s avoidance to high punishment frequency remain unknown. The present study explored psychophysiological, cognitive, and metacognitive processes associated with sensitivity to punishment frequency. We evaluated 54 participants (between 8 and 15 years old) with a modified Iowa Gambling Task for children (IGT-C) which included options with varying long-term profit and punishment frequencies. Skin conductance responses (SCRs) were recorded during this task. Additionally, we assessed IGT-C metacognitive knowledge, fluid intelligence, and executive functions. Participants exhibited behavioral avoidance and high anticipatory SCRs to options with high frequency of punishment. Moreover, age, IGT-C metacognitive knowledge, and inhibitory control were associated with individual differences in sensitivity to punishment frequency. Our results suggest that children’s preference for infrequently punished decisions is partially explained by psychophysiological signals as well as task complexity and development of cognitive control.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133683
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133683
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPunishment
dc.subjectChildren
dc.subjectPsychophysiological
dc.subjectCognitive
dc.subjectMetacognitive Processes
dc.titleStop Saying That It Is Wrong! Psychophysiological, Cognitive, and Metacognitive Markers of Children’s Sensitivity to Punishment
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución