Comparision of conventional and supercritical co2-extracted rosehip oil

Abstract

Supercritical CO2 (SCO2) can be utilized to extract oils from a number of plant materials as a nontoxic alternative to hexane, and there is industrial interest in using SCO2 extraction to obtain high-quality oils for cosmetics and other high-value applications, A possible substrate is rosehip (Rosa aff. rubiginosa) seed. The scope of our work was to select SCO2 extraction conditions and to compare cold-pressed, hexane-extracted and SCO2-extracted rosehip oil. We used a fractional factorial experimental design with extraction temperature (T, 40-60 degrees C), extraction pressure (p, 300-500 bar) and dynamic extraction time (t, 90-270 min) as independent variables and yield and color as response variables. Samples of 100 g flaked rosehip seeds were extracted with 21 g CO2/min, following a static extraction (15 min adjustment) period. Resulting data were analyzed using response surface methodology. Extracted oil (4.7-7.1% in our experimental region) increased slightly with p and more pronouncedly with T and specially t. On the other hand, the photometric color index was independent of t but worsened (increased) as a result of an increase in either p or specially T. We extracted five batches of 250 g seeds with 21 g CO2/min at 40 degrees C and 300 bar for 270 min and compared the oil with samples obtained by solvent extraction (a batch of 2.5 kg of laminated seeds was treated with 10 L hexane and rotaevaporated until there was virtually no residual hexane) and cold pressing, by determining color, fatty acid composition, iodine index and saponification index. It was concluded that SCO2 allows an almost complete recovery of rosehip oil (6.5% yield), which is of a better quality than the oil extracted with hexane. Yield was higher than it was when using a cold-pressing process (5.0% yield).