dc.date.accessioned2017-04-27T18:50:49Z
dc.date.available2017-04-27T18:50:49Z
dc.date.created2017-04-27T18:50:49Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier0186-4076
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10533/197206
dc.identifierD00I1011
dc.identifierWOS:000228774000007
dc.identifierWOS:000228774000007
dc.identifier0
dc.description.abstractDouble-ring infiltrometer, constant-head well permeameter, tension infiltrometer, and Porchet methods are compared to determine field-saturated hydraulic conductivity, K-fs. K-fs values of steady-state methods, which were calculated with analytical functions, are compared with saturated hydraulic conductivity, which is used to solve the Richards equation. Infiltration tests are carried out to estimate K-fs in natural soils, where the constant-head well permeameter method and the tension infiltrometer method show similar results, whereas the double-ring method exhibits high values and several installation problems. Even though the Porchet method is the easiest and cheapest method, it overestimates the K-fs value.
dc.languageENG
dc.publisherINST MEXICANO TECHNOLOGIAAGUA
dc.relation0
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Fondef/D00I1011
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/dataset/hdl.handle.net/10533/93477
dc.relationinstname: Conicyt
dc.relationreponame: Repositorio Digital RI2.0
dc.relationinstname: Conicyt
dc.relationreponame: Repositorio Digital RI2.0
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleMethods for measuring field-saturated hydraulic conductivity
dc.typeArticulo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución