dc.contributorSánchez, José Miguel
dc.contributorPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T20:48:37Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T20:48:37Z
dc.date.created2017-04-06T20:48:37Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10533/181639
dc.description.abstractIt is well-known that consumers’ intertemporal incentives may play a key role on the potential of firms to sustain collusion. All previous efforts studying the topic however, assumed perfect observability of actions. I consider a stylized model of collusion in durable goods with imperfect public monitoring, and document a series of new insights. In particular, results indicate that “price wars” may be an inefficiently costly discipline mechanism even when compared to other strongly symmetrical punishments, as they induce consumers to delay purchases. This could have important implication on the election of punishment procedures by cartels, and in the characterization of optimal collusion schemes. JEL Classification Codes: L12, L13, D43.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/PFCHA-Becas/RI20
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/dataset/hdl.handle.net/10533/93488
dc.relationhandle/10533/108040
dc.relationinstname: Conicyt
dc.relationreponame: Repositorio Digital RI2.0
dc.relationinstname: Conicyt
dc.relationreponame: Repositorio Digital RI2.0
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
dc.titleSymmetrical punishments, price wars and collusión in durable goods with imperfect public monitoring
dc.typeTesis Magíster


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución