dc.creatorGarcía, Carlos J.
dc.creatorRestrepo, Jorge
dc.creatorTanner, Evan
dc.date2015-04-03T20:24:50Z
dc.date2015-04-03T20:24:50Z
dc.date2009
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-19T21:15:58Z
dc.date.available2018-04-19T21:15:58Z
dc.identifierDocumentos de Investigación 227: 2009, p. 1-45
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.uahurtado.cl/handle/11242/6707
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1373749
dc.descriptionThis paper compares welfare levels under alternative fiscal rules for small open, commodity exporter, economies whose fiscal income varies with the world commodity price (in a dynamic, stochastic, and general equilibrium setting). Between the extremes of a procyclical balanced budget policy and an acyclical spending rule, there is a continuum of rules. Thus, the best degree of spending stabilization is found. The acylical rule benefits households that do not enjoy access to capital markets by providing a financial cushion that they themselves cannot provide, boosting their mean consumption. However, households that enjoy full access to capital markets suffer under this rule, since the government reduces their role in smoothing consumption and accumulating assets.
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherUniversidad Alberto Hurtado. Facultad de Economía y Negocios
dc.subjectFiscal rules
dc.subjectwelfare
dc.subjectsmall open economy
dc.subjectrule-of-thumb consumers
dc.titleFiscal Rules for Commodity Exporters: Prudence and Procyclicality
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución