dc.contributorTecnologico de Monterrey
dc.creatorde Crécy Lagard, Valérie
dc.creatorEl Yacoubi, Basma
dc.creatorde la Garza, Rocío D
dc.creatorNoiriel, Alexandre
dc.creatorHanson, Andrew D
dc.date2016-06-20T03:23:30Z
dc.date2016-06-20T03:23:30Z
dc.date23/07/2007
dc.date2016-06-01T12:18:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-16T19:00:44Z
dc.date.available2018-03-16T19:00:44Z
dc.identifierBMC Genomics. 2007 Jul 23;8(1):245
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-245
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11285/613679
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1222594
dc.descriptionAbstract Background Folate synthesis and salvage pathways are relatively well known from classical biochemistry and genetics but they have not been subjected to comparative genomic analysis. The availability of genome sequences from hundreds of diverse bacteria, and from Arabidopsis thaliana, enabled such an analysis using the SEED database and its tools. This study reports the results of the analysis and integrates them with new and existing experimental data. Results Based on sequence similarity and the clustering, fusion, and phylogenetic distribution of genes, several functional predictions emerged from this analysis. For bacteria, these included the existence of novel GTP cyclohydrolase I and folylpolyglutamate synthase gene families, and of a trifunctional p-aminobenzoate synthesis gene. For plants and bacteria, the predictions comprised the identities of a 'missing' folate synthesis gene (folQ) and of a folate transporter, and the absence from plants of a folate salvage enzyme. Genetic and biochemical tests bore out these predictions. Conclusion For bacteria, these results demonstrate that much can be learnt from comparative genomics, even for well-explored primary metabolic pathways. For plants, the findings particularly illustrate the potential for rapid functional assignment of unknown genes that have prokaryotic homologs, by analyzing which genes are associated with the latter. More generally, our data indicate how combined genomic analysis of both plants and prokaryotes can be more powerful than isolated examination of either group alone.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherOpen Access Publisher
dc.relationhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-8-245
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsde Crécy-Lagard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.subjectCiencias de la Salud / Health Sciences
dc.titleComparative genomics of bacterial and plant folate synthesis and salvage: predictions and validations
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución