| dc.contributor | | en-US |
| dc.creator | Vargas Casillas, Ana Patricia | |
| dc.creator | Mendoza Espinosa, Blanca Itzel | |
| dc.creator | Borges Yáñez, Socorro Aída | |
| dc.date | 2015-11-05 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-16T15:59:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-03-16T15:59:26Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://ojs.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/53006 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1204181 | |
| dc.description | The present article described a clinical case where it wasassessed whether aggregation of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) to the procedure of coronary-advanced flap with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft (CAF + SCTG) would improve the amount of root coverage in Miller’s class I and II gingival recessions when compared to the same isolated procedure in a patient suffering multiple gingival recessions, in a 6 month time-span. Twelve gingival recessions were included in the study: six treated with (CAF + SCTG + EMD) and six treated with (CAF + SCTG) in different quadrants. At beginning of procedure as well as six months later, the following clinical parameters were measured: gingival recession depth (RD), depth to probing (PD), clinical insertion level (CIL) andwidth of keratinized tissue (KT) in apex-coronary direction. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically signifi cant. Results established that after a six month procedure CAF + SCTG + EMD and CAF + SCTG produced signifi cant root coverage, respective averages were 2.83 ± 1.16 mm (p = 0.001) and 2.50 ± 0.83 mm (p = .002). All gingival recessions treated with EMD experienced 100% root coverage, sites treated with CAF + SCTG + EMD exhibited coverage of only 65.3%. When comparing results at six months, better results wereobserved with CAF + SCTG + EMD with respect to clinical insertion level (p = .02) and root coverage (p = .06). Nevertheless, neither the difference of clinical level insertion nor the gain in root coverage resulted significant. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between PD and KT. Conclusion: The present clinical case did not show additional benefi ts when EMD were aggregated to the CAF + SCTG in the coverage of multiple Miller’s class I and class II gingival recessions. | en-US |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Facultad de Odontología | es-ES |
| dc.relation | http://ojs.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/53006/47152 | |
| dc.rights | ##submission.copyrightStatement## | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 19, No 4-ING | es-ES |
| dc.source | 1870-199X | |
| dc.subject | | en-US |
| dc.subject | Gingival recession, coronary-advanced fl ap, connective tissue sub-epithelial graft, enamel matrix derivatives, periodontal regeneration. | en-US |
| dc.title | Clinical comparison of coronary displaced fl ap and sub-epithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix protein derivative for gingival recession coverage. Clinical case presentation | en-US |
| dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |
| dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |
