| dc.contributor | | en-US |
| dc.creator | Cárdenas Bahena, Ángel | |
| dc.creator | Sánchez García, Sergio | |
| dc.creator | Tinajero Morales, Carlos | |
| dc.creator | González Rodríguez, Víctor Manuel | |
| dc.creator | Baires Várguez, Laura | |
| dc.date | 2012-10-31 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-16T15:58:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-03-16T15:58:42Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://ojs.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/34169 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1204068 | |
| dc.description | Objective: To determine hypochlorite concentration of solutions used for root canal irrigation and compare them with concentrations deemed as “ideal” in scientific literature ( 5.25% and 2.5% (w / v)) Methods Opinion survey among endodontic specialists to ascertain sodium hypochlorite commercial brand most used in root canals irrigation. Iodometric titration to determine solution concentrations. Clorox Regular Bleach ( Oakland, California) commercial brand most referred to in literature. Mean comparison of different commercial brands and lots. Concentrations deemed ideal 5.25% and 2.5% (w / v). Results Commercial brands of sodium hypochlorite most used by 192 endodontic specialists were as follows: Cloralex ( 43.2%), Concentrated Clorox (30.2%), Viarzoni-t (16.7%), Great Value ( 1.0%), “Los Patitos” (0.5%) and other brands ( 8.3%). Concentration ( mean IC 95%) of Clorox Regular Bleach (6.34%, 6.32 – 6.36) Concentrated Clorox ( 5.43%, 5.42-5.45%), Cloralex (5.40%, %.38-5.41), Great Value ( 6.21% 6.19-6.23) and “ Los Patitos” ( 5.82%, 5.80-5.83) exceeded a 5.25% sodium hypochlorite concentration. Viarzone-T ( 2.86%, 2.85-2.87) rated above the 2.5% hypochlorite concentration. There were statistically significant differences (p≤0.001) among averages of different commercial brands and lots, with respect to concentrations deemed as ideal (5.25% and 2.5% (w/ v ). Conclusion Hypochlorite concentrations in commonly used commercial products are not the concentration recommended in scientific literature ( 5.25% w/v and 2.5 % w/v). This can cause tissue damage in cases when hypochlorite solutions are improperly used without field isolation | en-US |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Facultad de Odontología | es-ES |
| dc.relation | http://ojs.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/34169/31154 | |
| dc.source | Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 16, No 4-ING | es-ES |
| dc.source | 1870-199X | |
| dc.subject | | en-US |
| dc.subject | Sodium hypochlorite, root canal irrigation, iodometric titration | en-US |
| dc.title | Use of sodium Hypochlorite in root canal irrigation. Opinion survey and concentration in commercial products | en-US |
| dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |
| dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |
