dc.creatorSolari, Hernán G. I.
dc.date2022
dc.date2022
dc.date2023-09-01T14:00:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-24T03:49:27Z
dc.date.available2024-07-24T03:49:27Z
dc.identifierhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/157151
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9535327
dc.descriptionIs there just one science, the one we have, the given? Or on the contrary, are there several possible sciences? In the later case: which are their differences? Are they compatible? Complementary? Opposite? I will try to persuade the audience that at least three sciences can be distinguished: original blend, techno-science (normal science) and science of the postnormal age (call it transcendent science as it needs to go outside its field into the realm of decision making). I will distinguish the three at the epistemological level (arguably the deepest level) so that it may happen that what is scientific knowledge for one is not so for another.
dc.descriptionSociedad Latinoamericana de Ecología de Vectores
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.subjectCiencias Naturales
dc.subjectVector control
dc.subjectnormal science
dc.subjectpost-normal science
dc.titleControlling vectors: Do we need normal or post-normal science?
dc.typeObjeto de conferencia
dc.typeObjeto de conferencia


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución