dc.creatorCuesta Guzman, Mavenka
dc.creatorvillacob, karen
dc.date2022-07-18T14:50:02Z
dc.date2022-07-18T14:50:02Z
dc.date2018
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T21:03:35Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T21:03:35Z
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cecar.edu.co/handle/cecar/2890
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9508235
dc.descriptionEl presente capítulo pretende explicar el concepto de vulnerabilidad desde el modelo cognitivo-comportamental, haciendo una revisión de los distintos modelos teóricos que han intentado explicar su génesis y forma de funcionamiento para comprender la adquisición de patologías clínicas, como ha sido el caso de la depresión. La vulnerabilidad, como aquel factor que predispone al individuo al desarrollo de trastornos psicológicos, tiene una base biológica y psicológica, siendo esta última la que se abordó en el presente capítulo, entendiéndose como vulnerabilidad cognitiva, la cual inicia su formación a partir de la confluencia de diversos factores como el temperamento, el estilo de crianza, las experiencias tempranas y el sistema informacional individual. Estos factores confluyen en la formación de componentes cognitivos, denominados en la literatura como esquemas o creencias centrales, sistemas de procesamiento informacional, sesgos, errores de pensamiento, entre otros, que una vez instalados predisponen al individuo al malestar emocional al ser activados por sucesos llamados estresores. Es así, como la vulnerabilidad cognitiva no es un factor responsable de las patologías, pero sí predispone al sujeto a padecerlas, dependiendo de la relación que guarden el contenido del factor estresor con el contenido del esquema cognitivo aprendido. Una patología, donde mayormente ha sido estudiada la vulnerabilidad cognitiva, ha sido en la depresión.
dc.descriptionThis chapter aims to explain the concept of vulnerability from the cognitive-behavioral model, making a review of the different theoretical models that have tried to explain their genesis and way of functioning to understand the acquisition of clinical pathologies, as has been the case of depression. Vulnerability, as the factor that predisposes the individual to the development of psychological disorders, has a biological and psychological basis, the latter being addressed in this chapter, understood as cognitive vulnerability, which begins its formation from the confluence of various factors such as temperament, parenting style, early experiences and the individual information system. These factors converge in the formation of cognitive components, denominated in the literature as central schemes or beliefs, informational processing systems, biases, thinking errors, among others, which once installed predispose the individual to emotional distress when activated by events called stressors This is how cognitive vulnerability is not a factor responsible for pathologies, but it does predispose the subject to suffer them, depending on the relationship between the content of the stressor factor and the content of the cognitive scheme learned. A pathology, where cognitive vulnerability has mostly been studied, has been in depression.
dc.format19 Páginas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherCorporación Universitaria del Caribe - CECAR
dc.publisherSincelejo - Sucre Colombia
dc.relationLibro Psicología y vulnerabilidad
dc.relation92
dc.relation73
dc.relationPsicología y vulnerabilidad
dc.relationAbela, J.R.Z. (2002). Depressive mood reactions to failure in the achie-vement domain: a test of the integration of the hopelessness and self-esteem theories of depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(4), 531-552. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016236018858
dc.relationAbramson, L.Y., Seligman, M.E.P., & Teasdale, J.D. (1978). Lear-ned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. Jour-nal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49-74. http://dx.doi.or-g/10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49
dc.relationAlloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., & Francis, E. L. (1999). Do negative cognitive styles confer vulnerability to depression?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(4), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00030
dc.relationAlloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Walshaw, P. D., Gerstein, R. K., Keyser, J. D., Whitehouse, W. G., ... & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Behavioral approach system (BAS)–relevant cognitive styles and bipolar spectrum disorders: Concurrent and prospective associations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(3), 459. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016604
dc.relationBeck, A. (2012). Terapia cognitiva de la depresión; 20ª edición. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.
dc.relationBeck, J.S. (2000). Terapia cognitiva conceptos básicos y profundización. Barcelona, España: Editorial Gedisa.
dc.relationBeevers, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: a dual process model. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(7), 975-1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.03.003
dc.relationDe Raedt, R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Understanding vulnerability for depression from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: a reappraisal of attentional factors and a new conceptual framework. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.1.50
dc.relationDuque, A., López-Gómez, I., Blanco, I., & Vásquez, C. (2015). Modificación de sesgos cognitivos (msc) en depresión. Una revisión crítica de nuevos procedimientos para el cambio de sesgos cognitivos. Revista Terapia Psicológica, 33 (2), 103-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082015000200005
dc.relationFresco, D.M., Rytwinsky, N.K., & Craighead, L.W. (2007). Explanatory flexibility and negative life events interact to predict depression symp-toms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(5), 595-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.5.595
dc.relationGotlib, I. H., & Joormann, J. (2010). Cognition and depression: Current sta-tus and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131305
dc.relationHammen, C. (1991). Generation of stress in the course of unipolar depression. Journal of
dc.relationAbnormal Psychology, 100(4), 555-561. http://dx.doi.or-g/10.1037/0021-843X.100.4.555
dc.relationHervás, G., & Vázquez, C. (2006). La regulación afectiva: modelos, investigación e implicaciones para la salud mental y física. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 59(1-2), 9-32.
dc.relationIngram, R., Miranda, J., & Segal, Z. (1998). Cognitive Vulnerability to depression. New York: Guilford Press.
dc.relationInoñan, C., & Cassaretto, M. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de respuestas rumiativas en una muestra de adultos de Lima. (Tesis de pregrado). Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Recuperado de: http://tesis.pucp.edu.pe/repositorio/handle/123456789/1286
dc.relationKagan, J., & Snidman, N. (2004). The Long Shadow of Temperament. Massachusetts: Belknap Press.
dc.relationLeen-Feldner, E. W., Zvolensky, M. J., Feldner, M. T., & Lejuez, C. W. (2004). Behavioral inhibition: relation to negative emotion regulation and reactivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(6), 1235-1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00113-7
dc.relationLondoño, N.H., Jiménez, E.B., Juárez, F., Marín, C.A. (2010). The compo-nents of cognitive vulnerability to generalized anxiety disorder. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.811
dc.relationLyubomirsky, S., Caldwell, N., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1998). Effects of ruminative and distracting responses to depressed mood on retrieval of autobiographical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 166-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.166
dc.relationLyubomirsky, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1993). Self-perpetuating pro-perties of dysphoric rumination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 339-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.339
dc.relationLyubomirsky, S., Tucker, K., Caldwell, N. D., & Berg, K. (1999). Why ruminators are por problem solvers: Clues from the phenomenology of dysphoric rumination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1041-1060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1041
dc.relationMartínez, C. (2011). Psicooncología e indefensión aprendida. (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad de Granada, España. Recuperado de: http://di-gibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/15463
dc.relationMathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 167-195. ht-tps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143916
dc.relationMatt, G., Vázquez, C., y Campbell, K. (1992). Mood congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 12(2), 227-255. https://doi.or-g/10.1016/0272-7358(92)90116-P
dc.relationMcGonagle, K. A., & Kessler, R. C. (1990). Chronic stress, acute stress, and depressive symptoms. American journal of community psychology, 18(5), 681-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931237
dc.relationMoor, M., & Fresco, D. M (2007). The relationship of explanatory flexibi-lity to explanatory style. Behavior Therapy, 38(4), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2006.06.007
dc.relationNolan, S., Roberts, J., & Gotlib, I. (1998). Neuroticism and Ruminative Response Style as Predictors of Change in Depressive Symptoma-tology. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 22(5), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018769531641
dc.relationNolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000) The role of rumination in depressi-ve disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Jour-nal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(3), 504-511. http://dx.doi.or-g/10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.504
dc.relationNolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991) Responses to Depression and Their Effects on the Duration of Depressive Episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(4), 569-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.100.4.569
dc.relationPapageorgiou, C. & Wells, A. (2001). Positive beliefs about depressive ru-mination: development and preliminary validation of a self-report scale. Behavior Therapy, 32(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(01)80041-1
dc.relationRiso, W. (2009). Terapia cognitiva. Fundamentos teóricos y conceptualización del caso clínico. Barcelona, España: Editorial Paidós Ibérica.
dc.relationRoberts, J., Gilboa, E. & Gotlib, I. (1998) Ruminative Response Style and Vulnerability to Episodes of Dysphoria: Gender‚ Neuroticism‚ and Episode Duration. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22(4), 401-423. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018713313894
dc.relationSpasojevic, J., y Alloy, L. (2001) Rumination as a Common Mechanism Re-lating Depressive Risk Factors to Depression. Emotion, 1(1), 25-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.1.25
dc.relationTurner, R. J., Wheaton, B., & Lloyd, D. A. (1995). The epidemiology of social stress. American sociological review, 60(1) 104-125. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/2096348
dc.relationVanegas, H., Krouse, M., Bauer, S., Moessner, M., Espinoza, D., Carrasco, A., Botero, L., ..., & Patiño, J. (2017). Uso de e-mental health para el seguimiento posterapia de pacientes con depresión en Colombia. Revista Virtual Universidad Catolica de Chile, 52, 41-56. Recuperado de: http://revistavirtual.ucn.edu.co/index.php/RevistaUCN/article/view/943/1390
dc.relationVázquez, C, Hervas, G., Hernangómez, L., & Romero, N. (2010). Modelos cognitivos de la depresión síntesis y propuesta basada en 30 años de investigación. Psicología Conductual, 18(1), 139-165.
dc.relationVázquez, C., Díez-Alegría, C., Hernández-Lloreda, M.J., & Nieto, M. (2008). Implicit and explicit self-schema in active deluded, remitted deluded, and depressed patients. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39(4), 587-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2008.01.006
dc.relationWatkins, E., & Baracaia, S. (2001). Why do people ruminate in dyspho-ric moods? Personality and Individual Differences, 30(5), 723-734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00053-2
dc.relationWilliams, J. M. G., Barnhofer, T., Crane, C., Hermans, Raes, F., Watkins, Ed. & Dalgleish, T. (2007). Autobiographical memory specificity and emotional disorder. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 122-148. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0033-2909.133.1.122
dc.relationWhitmer, A. J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2013). An attentional scope model of ru-mination. psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1036-1061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030923
dc.relationYoung, J., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2013). Terapia de esquemas guía práctica. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcehttps://libros.cecar.edu.co/index.php/CECAR/catalog/view/1/95/898-1
dc.subjectVulnerabilidad
dc.subjectcomponentes cognitivos
dc.subjecttrastornos psicológicos
dc.subjectdepresión
dc.subjectVulnerability
dc.subjectcognitive components
dc.subjectpsychological disorders
dc.subjectdepression
dc.titleVULNERABILIDAD COGNITIVA: UNA MIRADA DESDE EL MODELO COGNITIVO-CONDUCTUAL
dc.typeCapítulo - Parte de Libro
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CAP_LIB
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución