Accessibility Measures to Opportunities in Urban Studies;
Medidas de Acessibilidade a Oportunidades em Estudos Urbanos

dc.creatorHishiyama, Jefferson
dc.creatorGonzales Taco, Pastor Willy
dc.date2022-04-05T19:53:34Z
dc.date2022-04-05T19:53:34Z
dc.date2021-01-10
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T20:52:54Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T20:52:54Z
dc.identifierHishiyama J., & Gonzales Taco P. W. (2021). Medidas de Accesibilidad a Oportunidades en Estudios Urbanos. Procesos Urbanos, 8(1), e514. https://doi.org/10.21892/2422085X.514
dc.identifier2422085X
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cecar.edu.co/handle/cecar/2230
dc.identifier10.21892/2422085X.514
dc.identifier2500-5200
dc.identifier10.21892/2422085X.514
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9505964
dc.descriptionEste estudio tiene como objetivo identificar los enfoques para medir la accesibilidad, sus indicadores y los principales temas de aplicación en el uso del suelo y los sistemas de transporte. Mediante un método híbrido de revisión sistemática de la literatura y análisis bibliométrico de redes de acoplamiento bibliográfico, se seleccionaron 54 publicaciones y se identificaron 7 temas de aplicación (transporte público, sistemas de transporte, planificación urbana, uso del suelo, entorno construido, análisis económico y nuevas tecnologías). Se verificó la versatilidad de las medidas de accesibilidad en los estudios urbanos y hubo una mayor oportunidad de contribución científica en temas emergentes relacionados con las nuevas tecnologías y sus implicaciones para la planificación urbana y del transporte.
dc.descriptionThis study aims to identify the approaches to measure accessibility, their indicators and main application themes in land use and transport systems. Through a hybrid method of systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of bibliographic coupling networks, 54 publications were selected and 7 application themes were identified (public transport, transport systems, urban planning, land use, built environment, economic analysis and new technologies). The versatility of accessibility measures in urban studies was verified and there was a greater opportunity for scientific contribution in emerging themes related to new technologies and their implications for urban and transport planning.
dc.descriptionEste estudo tem como objetivo identificar as abordagens de mensuração da acessibilidade, seus indicadores e principais temas de aplicação nos sistemas de uso do solo e transportes. Por meio de método híbrido de revisão sistemática da literatura e análise bibliométrica de redes de acoplamento bibliográfico, foram selecionadas 54 publicações e identificados 7 temas de aplicações (transporte público, sistemas de transporte, planejamento urbano, uso do solo, ambiente construído, análises econômicas e novas tecnologias). Verificou-se a versatilidade das medidas de acessibilidade em estudos urbanos e observou-se maior oportunidade de contribuição científica em temas emergentes relacionados a novas tecnologias e suas implicações no planejamento urbano e de transportes.
dc.format10 Páginas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageother
dc.publisherCorporación Universitaria del Caribe - CECAR
dc.publisherSincelejo
dc.relation10
dc.relation1
dc.relation1
dc.relation8
dc.relationProcesos Urbanos
dc.relationAcheampong, R. A., & Silva, E. A. (2015). Land use–transport interaction modeling: A review of the literature and future research directions. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(3), 11–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.806
dc.relationBroadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
dc.relationCao, K., Batty, M., Huang, B., Liu, Y., Yu, L., & Chen, J. (2011). Spatial multi-objective land use optimization: Extensions to the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(12), 1949–1969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.570269
dc.relationCao, K., Huang, B., Wang, S., & Lin, H. (2012). Sustainable land use optimization using Boundary-based Fast Genetic Algorithm. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(3), 257–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.08.001
dc.relationCerin, E., Leslie, E., Toit, L. du, Owen, N., & Frank, L. D. (2007). Destinations that matter: Associations with walking for transport. Health and Place, 13(3), 713–724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.11.002
dc.relationCoombes, E., Jones, A. P., & Hillsdon, M. (2010). The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Social Science and Medicine, 70(6), 816–822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.020
dc.relationCurrie, G. (2010). Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 31–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.12.002
dc.relationDi, Z., Yang, L., Qi, J., & Gao, Z. (2018). Transportation network design for maximizing flow-based accessibility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 110, 209–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.013
dc.relationGeurs, K., & Ritsema van Eck, J. R. (2001). Accessibility measures: review and applications. RIVM. Urban Research Centre, Utrecht University.
dc.relationGeurs, K., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
dc.relationGutiérrez, J. (2001). Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(4), 229–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00017-5
dc.relationHamidi, S., & Ewing, R. (2014). A longitudinal study of changes in urban sprawl between 2000 and 2010 in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 128, 72–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.021
dc.relationHandy, S. L., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997). Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29(7), 1175–1194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a291175
dc.relationHansen, W. G. (1959). How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Planning Association, 25(2), 73–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307
dc.relationKii, M., Nakanishi, H., Nakamura, K., & Doi, K. (2016). Transportation and spatial development: An overview and a future direction. Transport Policy, 49, 148–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.015
dc.relationKitamura, R., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (1997). A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Impacts of travel-based multitasking on mode choice and value of time View project Travel satisfaction View project. Transportation, 24, 125–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017959825565
dc.relationKitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. In EBSE: Vol. 2.3.
dc.relationMurray, A. T., Davis, R., Stimson, R. J., & Ferreira, L. (1998). Public transportation access. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 3(5), 319–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00010-8
dc.relationNajmi, A., Rashidi, T. H., Abbasi, A., & Travis Waller, S. (2017). Reviewing the transport domain: an evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis. Scientometrics, 110(2), 843–865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2171-3
dc.relationPáez, A., Scott, D. M., & Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016
dc.relationSousa, F. F. L. de M., Loureiro, C. F. G., & Lopes, A. S. (2017). Representação do fenômeno urbano por meio de modelos integrados dos transportes e uso do solo: revisão da literatura e discussão conceitual. Transportes, 25(4), 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v25i4.1319
dc.relationSu, S., Zhou, H., Xu, M., Ru, H., Wang, W., & Weng, M. (2019). Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 74(129), 62–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.003
dc.relationVerburg, P. H., Ritsema van Eck, J. R., de Nijs, T. C. M., Dijst, M. J., & Schot, P. (2004). Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(1), 125–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b307
dc.relationVickerman, R., Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (1999). Accessibility and economic development in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(1), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950118878
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsAtribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.cecar.edu.co/index.php/procesos-urbanos/article/view/e514
dc.subjectAccesibilidad
dc.subjecttransporte
dc.subjectuso del suelo
dc.subjectrevisión sistemática
dc.subjectacoplamiento bibliográfico
dc.subjectAccessibility
dc.subjecttransport
dc.subjectland use
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjectbibliographic coupling
dc.subjectAcessibilidade
dc.subjecttransporte
dc.subjectuso do solo
dc.subjectrevisão sistemática
dc.subjectacoplamento bibliográfico
dc.titleMedidas de Accesibilidad a Oportunidades en Estudios Urbanos
dc.titleAccessibility Measures to Opportunities in Urban Studies
dc.titleMedidas de Acessibilidade a Oportunidades em Estudos Urbanos
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución