dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorBarbieri, Fabio Augusto
dc.creatorGobbi, Lilian Teresa Bucken
dc.creatorSantiago, Paulo Roberto Pereira
dc.creatorCunha, Sérgio Augusto
dc.date2016-03-02T13:04:41Z
dc.date2016-10-25T21:33:37Z
dc.date2016-03-02T13:04:41Z
dc.date2016-10-25T21:33:37Z
dc.date2015
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T10:07:46Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T10:07:46Z
dc.identifierJournal of Sports Sciences, v. 33, n. 13, p. 1411-1419, 2015.
dc.identifier1466-447X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/135848
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/135848
dc.identifier10.1080/02640414.2014.990490
dc.identifier0585938559465147
dc.identifier9868835271822421
dc.identifier6762194285058568
dc.identifier5171760483641368
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.990490
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/946354
dc.descriptionThe aim of this study was to analyse the characteristics of the asymmetries in the dominant and non-dominant limbs when kicking stationary and rolling balls. Ten experienced Brazilian amateur futsal players participated in this study. Each participant performed kicks under two conditions (stationary ball vs. rolling ball) with the dominant and non-dominant limbs (five kicks per condition per limb). We analysed the kicking accuracy, ball and foot velocities, angular joint displacement and velocity. The asymmetry between the dominant and non-dominant limbs was analysed by symmetry index and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. The results did not reveal any interaction between the condition and limb for ball velocity, foot velocity and accuracy. However, kicking with the dominant limb in both kicks showed higher ball velocity (stationary ball: dominant - 24.27 ± 2.21 m · s(-1) and non-dominant - 21.62 ± 2.26 m · s(-1); rolling ball: dominant - 23.88 ± 2.71 m · s(-1) and non-dominant - 21.42 ± 2.25 m · s(-1)), foot velocity (stationary ball: dominant - 17.61 ± 1.87 m · s(-1) and non-dominant - 15.58 ± 2.69 m · s(-1); rolling ball: dominant - 17.25 ± 2.26 m · s(-1) and non-dominant - 14.77 ± 2.35 m · s(-1)) and accuracy (stationary ball: dominant - 1.17 ± 0.84 m and non-dominant - 1.56 ± 1.30 m; rolling ball: dominant - 1.31 ± 0.91 m and non-dominant - 1.97 ± 1.44 m). In addition, the angular joint adjustments were dependent on the limb in both kicks (the kicks with non-dominant limb showed lower hip external rotation than the kicks with the dominant limb), indicating that the hip joint is important in kick performance. In conclusion, the kicks with the non-dominant limb showed different angular adjustments in comparison to kicks with the dominant limb. In addition, kicking a rolling ball with the non-dominant limb showed higher asymmetry for accuracy, indicating that complex kicks are more asymmetric.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Sports Sciences
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectKick
dc.subjectMotor control
dc.subjectNon-dominant limb
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.titleDominant-non-dominant asymmetry of kicking a stationary and rolling ball in a futsal context
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución