dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorMatavelli, Cristiane
dc.creatorCarvalho, Maria João A.
dc.creatorMartins, Nelson E.
dc.creatorMirth, Christen K.
dc.date2015-12-07T15:33:20Z
dc.date2016-10-25T21:23:08Z
dc.date2015-12-07T15:33:20Z
dc.date2016-10-25T21:23:08Z
dc.date2015
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T09:29:00Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T09:29:00Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Insect Physiology, v. 82, p. 66-74, 2015.
dc.identifier1879-1611
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/131275
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/131275
dc.identifier10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.09.003
dc.identifier26358399
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.09.003
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/941815
dc.descriptionSpecies coexist using the same nutritional resource by partitioning it either in space or time, but few studies explore how species-specific nutritional requirements allow partitioning. Zaprionus indianus and Drosophila simulans co-exist in figs by invading the fruit at different stages; Z. indianus colonizes ripe figs, whereas D. simulans oviposits in decaying fruit. Larvae feed on yeast growing on the fruit, which serves as their primary protein source. Because yeast populations increase as fruit decays, we find that ripe fruit has lower protein content than rotting fruit. Therefore, we hypothesized that Z. indianus and D. simulans larvae differ in their dietary requirements for protein. We used nutritional geometry to assess the effects of protein and carbohydrate concentration in the larval diet on life history characters in both species. Survival, development time, and ovariole number respond differently to the composition of the larval diet, with Z. indianus generally performing better across a wider range of protein concentrations. Correspondingly, we found that Z. indianus females preferred to lay eggs on low protein foods, while D. simulans females chose higher protein foods for oviposition when competing with Z. indianus. We propose the different nutritional requirements and oviposition preference of these two species allows them to temporally partition their habitat.
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier B. V.
dc.relationJournal Of Insect Physiology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectLarval diet
dc.subjectLife-history traits
dc.subjectMacronutrient requirements
dc.subjectNutritional geometry
dc.subjectOviposition preference
dc.subjectStage of ripeness/decay
dc.subjectTemporal partitioning
dc.titleDifferences in larval nutritional requirements and female oviposition preference reflect the order of fruit colonization of Zaprionus indianus and Drosophila simulans
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución