Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho
dc.creatorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza
dc.creatorSilva, Emily Vivianne Freitas
dc.creatorBonatto, Liliane da Rocha
dc.creatorSantos, Daniela Micheline dos
dc.date2015-12-07T15:32:14Z
dc.date2016-10-25T21:22:53Z
dc.date2015-12-07T15:32:14Z
dc.date2016-10-25T21:22:53Z
dc.date2015
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T09:28:03Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T09:28:03Z
dc.identifierOral And Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 19, n. 3, p. 229-242, 2015.
dc.identifier1865-1569
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/131169
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/131169
dc.identifier10.1007/s10006-015-0494-5
dc.identifier0000-0002-3800-3050
dc.identifier25910993
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-015-0494-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/941709
dc.descriptionThis systematic review aimed to evaluate if the internal connection is more efficient than the external connection and its associated influencing factors. A specific question was formulated according to the Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome (PICO): Is internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? An electronic search of the MEDLINE and the Web of Knowledge databases was performed for relevant studies published in English up to November 2013 by two independent reviewers. The keywords used in the search included a combination of dental implant and internal connection or Morse connection or external connection. Selected studies were randomized clinical trials, prospective or retrospective studies, and in vitro studies with a clear aim of investigating the internal and/or external implant connection use. From an initial screening yield of 674 articles, 64 potentially relevant articles were selected after an evaluation of their titles and abstracts. Full texts of these articles were obtained with 29 articles fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Morse taper connection has the best sealing ability. Concerning crestal bone loss, internal connections presented better results than external connections. The limitation of the present study was the absence of randomized clinical trials that investigated if the internal connection was more efficient than the external connection. The external and internal connections have different mechanical, biological, and esthetical characteristics. Besides all systems that show proper success rates and effectiveness, crestal bone level maintenance is more important around internal connections than external connections. The Morse taper connection seems to be more efficient concerning biological aspects, allowing lower bacterial leakage and bone loss in single implants, including aesthetic regions. Additionally, this connection type can be successfully indicated for fixed partial prostheses and overdenture planning, since it exhibits high mechanical stability.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationOral And Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectConnection
dc.subjectBiomechanical phenomena
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.titleIs the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución