dc.creatorRamos Vera, Cristian
dc.creatorBasauri Delgado, Miguel Ángel
dc.creatorDíaz Peña, Misael
dc.creatorTinoco Alberto, José
dc.creatorPérez Arroyo, Karen
dc.creatorHerrera Mamaní, Betsabel
dc.creatorSánchez Villena, Andy
dc.creatorSaintila, Jacksaint
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-03T22:29:54Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-14T16:33:49Z
dc.date.available2023-11-03T22:29:54Z
dc.date.available2024-05-14T16:33:49Z
dc.date.created2023-11-03T22:29:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11955/1171
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1177%2F21501319231197589
dc.identifierJournal of Primary Care and Community Health
dc.identifierhttps://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85172252960&doi=10.1177%2f21501319231197589&origin=inward&txGid=2da3b6b3ecb3b3ba7d0c82f695f4fec3
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9405599
dc.description.abstractBackground: The stigma associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can lead to prejudice and discrimination against people who have been infected by this virus, consequently, it is important to have a validated tool to measure this phenomenon. However, there is only 1 national precedent that has validated the scores of this instrument in its 21-item version. Therefore, this study examined the bifactor structural equation method (SEM) and multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) structure of a 12-item human immunodeficiency virus stigma scale in Peruvian adults. Methods: We evaluated 342 patients (57.6% female and 42.45% male) diagnosed with HIV receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) from a hospital located in East Lima, aged 18 to 45 years (M = 31.4, SD = 9.79). A SEM was used to test 2 measurement models, a 4-factor correlated oblique model and a bifactor model due to high interfactor relationships. Results: Acceptable fit indices were identified for the oblique model (χ2/df = 1.26, SRMR = 0.044, RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.028 [0.000-0.047], CFI = 0.996, TLI = 0.994). In the same way, similar results were evident for the bifactor model (χ2/df = 1.14, SRMR = 0.039, RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.020 [0.000-0.044], CFI = 0.998, TLI = 0.997), however, in the latter it showed a greater explanation for the unidimensional model (H = 0.87, PUC = 0.82, LCA = 0.70), which was also evidenced by the bifactor MIRT analysis. Conclusion: It is concluded that the 12-item HIV Stigma Scale meets the psychometric properties of internal structure and unifactorial reliability.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Inc.
dc.publisherUS
dc.relationurn:issn: 2150-1319
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional - UNIFE
dc.subjectVIH-1
dc.subjectArtículo de revista
dc.subjectDiscriminación en psicología
dc.titleBifactor SEM and MIRT structure of a 12-item human immunodeficiency virus stigma scale in peruvian adults
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución