Endodontic retreatment: clinical comparison of reciprocating systems versus rotary system in disinfecting root canals

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorMartinho, Frederico C.
dc.creatorFreitas, Lilian F.
dc.creatorNascimento, Gustavo G.
dc.creatorFernandes, Aleteia M.
dc.creatorLeite, Fabio R. M.
dc.creatorGomes, Ana P. M.
dc.creatorCamoes, Izabel C. G.
dc.date2015-10-21T13:15:38Z
dc.date2016-10-25T21:06:28Z
dc.date2015-10-21T13:15:38Z
dc.date2016-10-25T21:06:28Z
dc.date2015-07-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T09:02:21Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T09:02:21Z
dc.identifierClinical Oral Investigations. Heidelberg: Springer Heidelberg, v. 19, n. 6, p. 1411-1417, 2015.
dc.identifier1432-6981
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/128920
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/128920
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1360-9
dc.identifierWOS:000356774100027
dc.identifierhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00784-014-1360-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/939476
dc.descriptionIntroduction This clinical study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems in removing endotoxins and cultivable bacteria in endodontic retreatment.Methods Thirty endodontically treated teeth with post-treatment apical periodontitis were selected. The specimens were divided into three groups according to the system used: WaveOne (n=10), Reciproc instrument (n=10), and ProTaper Universal Retreatment system (n=10). Samples were collected before and after chemomechanical preparation. The irrigation was performed by using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. A chromogenic limulus amebocyte lysate assay test was used to quantify endotoxins. Culture techniques were used to determine bacterial colony-forming unit counts.Results At baseline, endotoxins and cultivable bacteria were recovered from 100% of the root canal samples in a median value of 5.84 EU/mL and 4.98x10(3) CFU/mL, respectively. After CMP, no differences were found in the median percentage values of endotoxin reduction achieved with reciprocating systems-WaveOne [94.11%] and Reciproc [93.29%] and with rotary systems-ProTaper [94.98%] (P>0.05). Both single-file reciprocating systems [WaveOne (98.27%) and Reciproc (99.54%)] and rotary system [ProTaper (98.73%)] were effective in reducing bacterial load (P>0.05). Moreover, no differences were found among the systems tested.Conclusions The Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating systems were as effective as the ProTaper system for removal of endotoxins and bacteria in endodontic retreatment.Clinical relevance All systems tested were effective to remove cultivable bacteria and endotoxin in endodontic retreatment. As no differences among systems were observed, it is possible to suggest that clinicians should choose the preferred technique to perform endodontic.
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationClinical Oral Investigations
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEndotoxin
dc.subjectReciprocating motion
dc.subjectNickel-titanium files
dc.subjectEndodontic retreatment
dc.titleEndodontic retreatment: clinical comparison of reciprocating systems versus rotary system in disinfecting root canals
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución