dc.creatorKlassen, Robert M.
dc.creatorKrawchuk, Lindsey L.
dc.date.accessioned7/16/2014 11:37
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-08T20:51:30Z
dc.date.available7/16/2014 11:37
dc.date.available2024-05-08T20:51:30Z
dc.date.created7/16/2014 11:37
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier0361-476X
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/2959
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9376003
dc.description.abstractThis article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-variables are related to procrastination, self-efficacy for self-regulation is most predictive of procrastination tendencies. Study 2 examines academic and motivation characteristics of “negative procrastinators,” the undergraduates who are most adversely influenced by procrastination. The 25% of 195 participants in Study 2 who were classified as negative procrastinators had significantly lower GPAs, higher levels of daily and task procrastination, lower predicted and actual class grades, and lower self-efficacy for self-regulation. After controlling for GPA, daily procrastination and self-efficacy for self-regulation significantly predicted the negative impact of procrastination. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance that self-efficacy for self-regulation holds for procrastination research, and with suggestions for practitioners who work with students who are adversely affected by procrastination.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectMotivación
dc.subjectAutoevaluación
dc.subjectEstudiante universitario
dc.titleAcademic procrastination of undergraduates : Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución