dc.creatorTillson, John
dc.date.accessioned7/15/2014 11:16
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-08T20:38:10Z
dc.date.available7/15/2014 11:16
dc.date.available2024-05-08T20:38:10Z
dc.date.created7/15/2014 11:16
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier1467-9752
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/2924
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9373039
dc.description.abstractThis article addresses two questions. The first question is this: ‘when ought teachers to encourage or discourage students’ belief of a given proposition on the one hand (call this ‘directive teaching’), and when ought teachers to simply facilitate students’ understanding of that proposition, on the other (call this ‘non-directive teaching’) (cf. the work of Michael Hand)? The second question is this: ‘which propositional content should curricula address?’ An answer to these questions would amount to what I will call a ‘theory of propositional curricula content’, by providing both a means for choosing content, and a directive for teaching that content. While the answer that I give to the second question is unlikely to prove exhaustive, I still consider that it would form an important part of the answer, hence the title a ‘towards a theory of propositional curricula content’.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.subjectDiseño curricular
dc.subjectFilosofía
dc.titleTowards a Theory of Propositional Curriculum Content
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución